These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23231544)

  • 1. Visual rightward spatial bias varies as a function of age.
    Takio F; Koivisto M; Tuominen T; Laukka SJ; Hämäläinen H
    Laterality; 2013; 18(1):44-67. PubMed ID: 23231544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory rightward spatial bias varies as a function of age.
    Takio F; Koivisto M; Laukka SJ; Hämäläinen H
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2011; 36(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 21462013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-related changes in visual pseudoneglect.
    Schmitz R; Peigneux P
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Aug; 76(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 21536360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lower-right and upper-left biases within upper and lower visual fields in a circular array task.
    Szelest I; Elias LJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Dec; 119(3):861-79. PubMed ID: 25375827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring the spatial distribution of the metaattentional spotlight.
    Kawahara J
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 20006524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial attention increases performance but not subjective confidence in a discrimination task.
    Wilimzig C; Tsuchiya N; Fahle M; Einhäuser W; Koch C
    J Vis; 2008 May; 8(5):7.1-10. PubMed ID: 18842078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Right visual field advantage for perceived contrast: correlation with an auditory bias and handedness.
    Railo H; Tallus J; Hämäläinen H
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Dec; 77(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 21962763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objections against the view of visual extinction as an attentional disengagement deficit: the interaction between spatial position and temporal modulation.
    de Haan B; Karnath HO
    Cortex; 2012 Sep; 48(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 21513929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual impairment at large eccentricity in participants treated by vigabatrin: visual, attentional or recognition deficit?
    Naili F; Boucart M; Derambure P; Arndt C
    Epilepsy Res; 2009 Dec; 87(2-3):213-22. PubMed ID: 19800764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: the effect of perceptual difficulty.
    Prinzmetal W; Zvinyatskovskiy A; Gutierrez P; Dilem L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):352-69. PubMed ID: 18609402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus.
    Castro-Barros BA; Righi LL; Grechi G; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 17961895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What visual information do children and adults consider while switching between tasks? Eye-tracking investigation of cognitive flexibility development.
    Chevalier N; Blaye A; Dufau S; Lucenet J
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jul; 46(4):955-72. PubMed ID: 20604615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What determines sustained visual attention? The impact of distracter positions, task difficulty and visual fields compared.
    Kraft A; Pape N; Hagendorf H; Schmidt S; Naito A; Brandt SA
    Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1133(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 17174284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective attention to spatial and non-spatial visual stimuli is affected differentially by age: effects on event-related brain potentials and performance data.
    Talsma D; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):249-61. PubMed ID: 16806547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual processing and infant ocular Latencies in the overlap paradigm.
    Blaga OM; Colombo J
    Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1069-76. PubMed ID: 17087542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention.
    Fischer MH; Castel AD; Dodd MD; Pratt J
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Jun; 6(6):555-6. PubMed ID: 12754517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Valenza N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):788-99. PubMed ID: 15904545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial frequency-specific effects on the attentional bias: Evidence for two attentional systems.
    Singh VV; Stojanoski B; Le A; Niemeier M
    Cortex; 2011 May; 47(5):547-56. PubMed ID: 20447620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.