417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23231816)
1. Cortical encoding of timbre changes in cochlear implant users.
Zhang F; Benson C; Cahn SJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 23231816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Rahne T; Plontke SK; Wagner L
Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 1586():143-51. PubMed ID: 25152464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cortical encoding of pitch contour changes in cochlear implant users: a mismatch negativity study.
Zhang F; Benson C; Fu QJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(5):275-88. PubMed ID: 23920129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
Arehart KH; Croghan NB; Muralimanohar RK
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
Macherey O; Delpierre A
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adapting to the Sound of Music - Development of Music Discrimination Skills in Recently Implanted CI Users.
Seeberg AB; Haumann NT; Højlund A; Andersen ASF; Faulkner KF; Brattico E; Vuust P; Petersen B
Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165221148035. PubMed ID: 36597692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recovery function of the late auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Zhang F; Samy RN; Anderson JM; Houston L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):397-408. PubMed ID: 19928394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Residual neural processing of musical sound features in adult cochlear implant users.
Timm L; Vuust P; Brattico E; Agrawal D; Debener S; Büchner A; Dengler R; Wittfoth M
Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():181. PubMed ID: 24772074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporal feature perception in cochlear implant users.
Timm L; Agrawal D; C Viola F; Sandmann P; Debener S; Büchner A; Dengler R; Wittfoth M
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45375. PubMed ID: 23028971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pitch expertise is not created equal: Cross-domain effects of musicianship and tone language experience on neural and behavioural discrimination of speech and music.
Hutka S; Bidelman GM; Moreno S
Neuropsychologia; 2015 May; 71():52-63. PubMed ID: 25797590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Neurophysiological Study of Musical Pitch Identification in Mandarin-Speaking Cochlear Implant Users.
Cai J; Liu Y; Yao M; Xu M; Zhang H
Neural Plast; 2020; 2020():4576729. PubMed ID: 32774355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.
Moberly AC; Bhat J; Shahin AJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 26655914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users.
Heng J; Cantarero G; Elhilali M; Limb CJ
Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):192-200. PubMed ID: 21664263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An objective auditory measure to assess speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users.
Turgeon C; Lazzouni L; Lepore F; Ellemberg D
Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Apr; 125(4):827-835. PubMed ID: 24209981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mismatch negativity and adaptation measures of the late auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users.
Zhang F; Hammer T; Banks HL; Benson C; Xiang J; Fu QJ
Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):17-29. PubMed ID: 21129468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Music perception in cochlear implant users: an event-related potential study.
Koelsch S; Wittfoth M; Wolf A; Müller J; Hahne A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):966-72. PubMed ID: 15003780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in Perception of Musical Stimuli among Acoustic, Electric, and Combined Modality Listeners.
Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Nash JJ; Runge CL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 26055838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
Cooper WB; Tobey E; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
