These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23232619)

  • 1. Number needed to misdiagnose: a measure of diagnostic test effectiveness.
    Habibzadeh F; Yadollahie M
    Epidemiology; 2013 Jan; 24(1):170. PubMed ID: 23232619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computers in paediatrics. 18. Medical decision making: computer program to calculate sensitivity, specificity, false positive and negative rates, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of a diagnostic test.
    Yip WC; Tay JS; Ho TF; Wong HB
    J Singapore Paediatr Soc; 1986; 28(1-2):74-8. PubMed ID: 3531721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Diagnostic likelihood ratios].
    Capron L
    Rev Prat; 2000 Nov; 50(17):1865-9. PubMed ID: 11151325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A critique on contemporary reporting of likelihood ratios in test power analysis.
    Weissler AM; Bailey KR
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2004 Oct; 79(10):1317-8. PubMed ID: 15473417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Roaming through methodology. XXXII. False test results].
    van der Weijden T; van den Akker M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 May; 145(19):906-8. PubMed ID: 11387865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
    Bowden SC; Loring DW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Studies about diagnostic tests: interpreting the results].
    Salech F; Mery V; Larrondo F; Rada G
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Sep; 136(9):1203-8. PubMed ID: 19030668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A new concept and method of standardizing predictive value].
    Shen H; Chen Q
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 1994 Dec; 15(6):360-2. PubMed ID: 7874707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gene expression profile assays as predictors of recurrence-free survival in early-stage breast cancer: a metaanalysis.
    Lyman GH; Kuderer NM
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2006 Dec; 7(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 17239261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Likelihood ratios, sensitivity, and specificity values can be back-calculated when the odds ratios are known.
    Simel DL; Easter J; Tomlinson G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):458-60. PubMed ID: 23021858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Prevention of false results in tests for occult blood in feces].
    Zwillenberg LO
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1990 Apr; 79(17):521-3. PubMed ID: 2187220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of diagnostic tests.
    Gjørup T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1997; 166():9-14. PubMed ID: 9253371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of recurrent rectal neoplasms: comparison of reliability and errors of both methods].
    Golfieri R; Totaro C; Giampalma E; Lalli A; Sbrozzi F; Soro A; Nogara G; Gavelli G
    Radiol Med; 1996 May; 91(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 8693127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayes theorem: Fully informed rational estimates of diagnostic probabilities.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jun; 141(6):658-9. PubMed ID: 20516096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of diagnostic or screening procedures. Validity of tests, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values. Definition and indications for mass screening].
    Durand-Zaleski I; Bastuji-Garin S
    Rev Prat; 2000 May; 50(10):1155-8. PubMed ID: 10905104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of (IgG-ELISA) serology as an alternative diagnostic method for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with gastro-intestinal bleeding due to gastro-duodenal ulcer.
    García-Díaz E; Castro-Fernández M; Romero-Gómez M; Vargas-Romero J
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2002 Dec; 94(12):725-36. PubMed ID: 12733331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy of immediate interpretation of fine needle aspirates.
    Verma K; Tiwari MC; Agarwal J; Kapila K
    Indian J Med Res; 1991 Jun; 94():197-9. PubMed ID: 1937602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests].
    Marchi F
    G Ital Cardiol; 1981; 11(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 7286506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. External quality assurance for the laboratory diagnosis of Buruli ulcer disease in Ghana.
    Bretzel G; Siegmund V; Nitschke J; Herbinger KH; Thompson R; Fleischmann E; Fleischer B; Adjei O
    Trop Med Int Health; 2006 Nov; 11(11):1688-93. PubMed ID: 17054748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.