These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23233157)

  • 21. The Competitive Influences of Perceptual Load and Working Memory Guidance on Selective Attention.
    Tan J; Zhao Y; Wang L; Tian X; Cui Y; Yang Q; Pan W; Zhao X; Chen A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129533. PubMed ID: 26098079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A taxonomy of external and internal attention.
    Chun MM; Golomb JD; Turk-Browne NB
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2011; 62():73-101. PubMed ID: 19575619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.
    De Vito D; Ferrey AE; Fenske MJ; Al-Aidroos N
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 18(3):460-475. PubMed ID: 29546688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Specialization in the default mode: Task-induced brain deactivations dissociate between visual working memory and attention.
    Mayer JS; Roebroeck A; Maurer K; Linden DE
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Jan; 31(1):126-39. PubMed ID: 19639552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attentional capture by working memory contents.
    Pan Y
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 20565178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What's the object of object working memory in infancy? Unraveling 'what' and 'how many'.
    Kibbe MM; Leslie AM
    Cogn Psychol; 2013 Jun; 66(4):380-404. PubMed ID: 23770623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Declarative and procedural working memory updating processes are mutually facilitative.
    Sali AW; Egner T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1858-1871. PubMed ID: 31875313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):357-371. PubMed ID: 29943810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Common capacity-limited neural mechanisms of selective attention and spatial working memory encoding.
    Fusser F; Linden DE; Rahm B; Hampel H; Haenschel C; Mayer JS
    Eur J Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 34(5):827-38. PubMed ID: 21781193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Competition in working memory reduces frontal guidance of visual selection.
    Soto D; Greene CM; Chaudhary A; Rotshtein P
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 May; 22(5):1159-69. PubMed ID: 21775675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The state of memory-matched distractor in working memory influence the visual attention.
    Long Q; Luo T; Zhang S; Jiang Y; Hu N; Gu Y; Xu P; Chen A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0242721. PubMed ID: 33259519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The capacity and resolution of spatial working memory and its role in the storage of non-spatial features.
    McCants CW; Katus T; Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jan; 140():108-118. PubMed ID: 30550778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing the Role of the Left Dorsal Frontal Cortex in Working Memory Guidance: Attentional or Mnemonic? A Neurostimulation Study.
    Bourbon-Teles J; Soto D
    Neuroscience; 2019 Jul; 411():140-149. PubMed ID: 31103707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. False memory at short and long term.
    Abadie M; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Aug; 148(8):1312-1334. PubMed ID: 30550338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stable population coding for working memory coexists with heterogeneous neural dynamics in prefrontal cortex.
    Murray JD; Bernacchia A; Roy NA; Constantinidis C; Romo R; Wang XJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jan; 114(2):394-399. PubMed ID: 28028221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multiple foci of spatial attention in multimodal working memory.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():583-589. PubMed ID: 27544450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transfer after Dual n-Back Training Depends on Striatal Activation Change.
    Salminen T; Kühn S; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(39):10198-213. PubMed ID: 27683914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory.
    Zhou Y; Curtis CE; Sreenivasan KK; Fougnie D
    J Neurosci; 2022 Sep; 42(37):7110-7120. PubMed ID: 35927036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Independent Attention Mechanisms Control the Activation of Tactile and Visual Working Memory Representations.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 May; 30(5):644-655. PubMed ID: 29346019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prioritizing Information during Working Memory: Beyond Sustained Internal Attention.
    Myers NE; Stokes MG; Nobre AC
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2017 Jun; 21(6):449-461. PubMed ID: 28454719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.