These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23233470)

  • 1. Warmth and competence on the witness stand: implications for the credibility of male and female expert witnesses.
    Neal TM; Guadagno RE; Eno CA; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):488-97. PubMed ID: 23233470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commentary: observations and concerns on the bigendering of our forensic fields.
    Lacoursiere R
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):498-501. PubMed ID: 23233471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Credibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?
    Brodsky SL; Neal TM; Cramer RJ; Ziemke MH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 20019000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in expert witness knowledge: do mock jurors notice and does it matter?
    Parrott CT; Neal TM; Wilson JK; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Mar; 43(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 25770282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender and the experience of mental health expert witness testimony.
    Kaempf AC; Baxter P; Packer IK; Pinals DA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Mar; 43(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 25770280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptions of bias and credibility of male and female clinical psychologist and psychiatrist expert witnesses presenting clinical information in the courtroom.
    Kipoulas E; Edwards I; Radakovic R; Beazley PI
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024; 96():102016. PubMed ID: 39213688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assertive women as expert witnesses: a study of assertive and defensive responses in male and female experts.
    Larson BA; Brodsky SL
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(2):149-63. PubMed ID: 24691753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
    Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Jurors' perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility.
    McCarthy Wilcox A; NicDaeid N
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():100-108. PubMed ID: 30216840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brushed-off testimony.
    Brodsky SL; Wygant DB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):562-5. PubMed ID: 23233479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Letters.
    Leporowski DK
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):590. PubMed ID: 23233480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.
    Krauss DA; Lieberman JD; Olson J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):801-22. PubMed ID: 15568199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of death qualification and need for cognition in venirepersons' evaluations of expert scientific testimony in capital trials.
    Butler B; Moran G
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):561-71. PubMed ID: 17440900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expert witness confidence and juror personality: their impact on credibility and persuasion in the courtroom.
    Cramer RJ; Brodsky SL; DeCoster J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19297636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of gender stereotypes on the evaluation of general practitioners' communication skills: an experimental study using transcripts of physician-patient encounters.
    Nicolai J; Demmel R
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):200-5. PubMed ID: 17942269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender, smiling, and witness credibility in actual trials.
    Nagle JE; Brodsky SL; Weeter K
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 24634058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of the deliberation process and jurors' prior legal knowledge on the sentence: the role of psychological expertise and crime scene photo.
    Finkelstein R; Bastounis M
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):426-41. PubMed ID: 20014448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Witness Credibility Scale: an outcome measure for expert witness research.
    Brodsky SL; Griffin MP; Cramer RJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):892-907. PubMed ID: 20077497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commentary: Perception of remorse by mock jurors in a capital murder trial.
    Batista LM; Myers W
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22396342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.