212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23233470)
1. Warmth and competence on the witness stand: implications for the credibility of male and female expert witnesses.
Neal TM; Guadagno RE; Eno CA; Brodsky SL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):488-97. PubMed ID: 23233470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Commentary: observations and concerns on the bigendering of our forensic fields.
Lacoursiere R
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):498-501. PubMed ID: 23233471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Credibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?
Brodsky SL; Neal TM; Cramer RJ; Ziemke MH
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 20019000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in expert witness knowledge: do mock jurors notice and does it matter?
Parrott CT; Neal TM; Wilson JK; Brodsky SL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Mar; 43(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 25770282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gender and the experience of mental health expert witness testimony.
Kaempf AC; Baxter P; Packer IK; Pinals DA
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Mar; 43(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 25770280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assertive women as expert witnesses: a study of assertive and defensive responses in male and female experts.
Larson BA; Brodsky SL
Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(2):149-63. PubMed ID: 24691753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Jurors' perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility.
McCarthy Wilcox A; NicDaeid N
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():100-108. PubMed ID: 30216840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Brushed-off testimony.
Brodsky SL; Wygant DB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):562-5. PubMed ID: 23233479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Letters.
Leporowski DK
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):590. PubMed ID: 23233480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.
Krauss DA; Lieberman JD; Olson J
Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):801-22. PubMed ID: 15568199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of death qualification and need for cognition in venirepersons' evaluations of expert scientific testimony in capital trials.
Butler B; Moran G
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):561-71. PubMed ID: 17440900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expert witness confidence and juror personality: their impact on credibility and persuasion in the courtroom.
Cramer RJ; Brodsky SL; DeCoster J
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19297636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of gender stereotypes on the evaluation of general practitioners' communication skills: an experimental study using transcripts of physician-patient encounters.
Nicolai J; Demmel R
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):200-5. PubMed ID: 17942269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender, smiling, and witness credibility in actual trials.
Nagle JE; Brodsky SL; Weeter K
Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 24634058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of the deliberation process and jurors' prior legal knowledge on the sentence: the role of psychological expertise and crime scene photo.
Finkelstein R; Bastounis M
Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):426-41. PubMed ID: 20014448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Witness Credibility Scale: an outcome measure for expert witness research.
Brodsky SL; Griffin MP; Cramer RJ
Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):892-907. PubMed ID: 20077497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Commentary: Perception of remorse by mock jurors in a capital murder trial.
Batista LM; Myers W
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22396342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The testimony of forensic identification science: what expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.
McQuiston-Surrett D; Saks MJ
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):436-53. PubMed ID: 19259800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
