269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23233479)
1. Brushed-off testimony.
Brodsky SL; Wygant DB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):562-5. PubMed ID: 23233479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Commentary: observations and concerns on the bigendering of our forensic fields.
Lacoursiere R
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):498-501. PubMed ID: 23233471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Warmth and competence on the witness stand: implications for the credibility of male and female expert witnesses.
Neal TM; Guadagno RE; Eno CA; Brodsky SL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):488-97. PubMed ID: 23233470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The forensic psychiatrist: consultant versus activist in legal doctrine.
Diamond BL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(2):119-32. PubMed ID: 1633333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An unwelcome guest: the unconscious mind in the courtroom.
Kapoor R; Williams A
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 23233464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Becoming a real doctor: my transition from fellowship to faculty.
Cooke BK
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):132-4. PubMed ID: 22396351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Professional versus personal ethics: methods for system reform?
Miller RD
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(2):163-77. PubMed ID: 1633337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Forensic psychiatry: the need for self-regulation.
Appelbaum PS
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 1633336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Credibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?
Brodsky SL; Neal TM; Cramer RJ; Ziemke MH
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 20019000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Your experiences with autopsy].
Zinka B; Koch I; Graw M; Peschel O
MMW Fortschr Med; 2015 May; 157(9):6-7. PubMed ID: 26012795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Present misuses of article 64 of the Criminal Code on insanity when performing the deed].
Bénézech M
Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1989 Sep; 147(7):738-41. PubMed ID: 2619143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Keeping criticism at bay: suggestions for forensic psychiatry experts.
Friend A
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 14974793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Who is culpable? The insanity defense.
Carpenter WT
Biol Psychiatry; 1983 Sep; 18(9):947-50. PubMed ID: 6640007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical ethical problems of the forensic psychiatrist in dealing with attorneys.
Sadoff RL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 6478067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Disability guideline, role conflicts, and treatment records.
Edwards HB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):392-6. PubMed ID: 19767506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Insanity defense debated hotly in wake of verdict in Hinckley trial.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Oct; 33(10):863-4. PubMed ID: 7129380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Homicide markers from the viewpoint of the psychiatric expert].
Janzarik W
Nervenarzt; 1992 Nov; 63(11):656-67. PubMed ID: 1470268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Forensic aspects in daily practice, law and psychiatry. 1].
Hoffmann-Richter U; Dittmann V
Psychiatr Prax; 1996 Jan; 23(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8851237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Commentary: personality disorders and criminal law.
Slovenko R
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 19535554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and expert testimony.
Hoge SK; Grisso T
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 1576376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
