166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23234336)
21. Scientific misconduct. Misconduct by postdocs leads to retraction of papers.
Miller G
Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5999):1583. PubMed ID: 20929816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Shaking up science.
Couzin-Frankel J
Science; 2013 Jan; 339(6118):386-9. PubMed ID: 23349264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Publishing: Journals' role in ethical research.
Baumgartner H
Nature; 2012 Apr; 484(7392):37. PubMed ID: 22481345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [The fate of scientific articles when errors and scientific misconduct are detected].
Vinther S; Rosenberg J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2014 Jan; 176(4A):V07130425. PubMed ID: 25347246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Publish wisely or perish: quality rather than quantity in medical writing.
Fletcher SW; Fletcher RH
Ann Acad Med Singap; 1994 Nov; 23(6):799-800. PubMed ID: 7741488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Fraud in biomedical research--the role of journal editors.
De Caterina R; Griffioen AW; Porreca F
Life Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(21-22):755-6. PubMed ID: 21983417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.
Wager E; Williams P
J Med Ethics; 2011 Sep; 37(9):567-70. PubMed ID: 21486985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Nature group journal retracts two papers after cancer researcher was found to have falsified data.
Siva N
BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d5218. PubMed ID: 21844161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Medical journal retracts paper over falsified data.
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6895):266. PubMed ID: 12124591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Retraction notice.
Shafer SL
Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1351. PubMed ID: 19299814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Of predatory publishers and spurious impact factors.
Sohail S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Aug; 24(8):537-8. PubMed ID: 25149828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Review Failure Index as the Opposite Reflection of the Retraction Rate. A Proposal for a New Journal Metric Index.
Georgiadis GS; Argyriou C; Papanas N; Lazarides MK
Ann Vasc Surg; 2021 Aug; 75():e5-e7. PubMed ID: 33901613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct.
Bosch X
J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):644-6. PubMed ID: 24505117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Scientific publishing. Retracted papers spur million-dollar lawsuit.
Travis J
Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5747):425. PubMed ID: 16239453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The science of retraction.
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Coping with scientific misconduct.
Wager E
BMJ; 2011 Oct; 343():d6586. PubMed ID: 22016451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Retraction challenges.
Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):5. PubMed ID: 25279879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Dealing with charges of scientific misconduct.
Galyean M
J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1035. PubMed ID: 18417753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
