BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23234470)

  • 21. The FDA and deference lost: a self-inflicted wound or the product of a wounded agency? A response to Professor O'Reilly.
    Vladeck DC
    Cornell Law Rev; 2008 Jul; 93(5):981-1002. PubMed ID: 18618967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: FDA oversight. End-of-year issue brief.
    Chaps NA
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2010 Jan; ():1-31. PubMed ID: 20217914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Company pays over $81m for allegedly promoting topiramate for unapproved uses.
    Kmietowicz Z
    BMJ; 2010 May; 340():c2848. PubMed ID: 20508021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The FDA, preemption, and the Supreme Court.
    Glantz LH; Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2008 May; 358(18):1883-5. PubMed ID: 18450601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pros and cons of off-label promotion investigations and prosecutions.
    Loucks MK
    Food Drug Law J; 2006; 61(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 16989041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Drug risks and free speech--can Congress ban consumer drug ads?
    Shuchman M
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(22):2236-9. PubMed ID: 17476002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing supplement safety--the FDA's controversial proposal.
    Cohen PA
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Feb; 366(5):389-91. PubMed ID: 22276780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The FDA and the pharmaceutical industry: is regulation contributing to drug shortage?
    Roman A
    Albany Law Rev; 2013-2014; 77(2):539-77. PubMed ID: 24851322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On access and accountability--two Supreme Court rulings on generic drugs.
    Boumil MM; Curfman GD
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Aug; 369(8):696-7. PubMed ID: 23923990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Repackaging cigarettes--will the courts thwart the FDA?
    Bayer R; Gostin L; Marcus-Toll D
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Nov; 367(22):2065-7. PubMed ID: 23151279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prescribing records and the First Amendment--New Hampshire's data-mining statute.
    Post R
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Feb; 360(8):745-7. PubMed ID: 19228615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests, government oversight, and the First Amendment: what the government can (and can't) do to protect the public's health.
    Javitt GH; Stanley E; Hudson K
    Oklahoma Law Rev; 2004; 57(2):251-302. PubMed ID: 15658034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A patient's right of privacy in computerized pharmacy records.
    Mowery G
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1998; 66(2):697-746. PubMed ID: 16211743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The strange allure of state "right-to-try" laws.
    Zettler PJ; Greely HT
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Dec; 174(12):1885-6. PubMed ID: 25264589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The federal preemption debate in pharmaceutical labeling product liability actions.
    Gross JM; Curry JA
    Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2007; 43(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 18354866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Off-label prescription advertising, the FDA and the First Amendment: a study in the values of commercial speech protection.
    Klasmeier C; Redish MH
    Am J Law Med; 2011; 37(2-3):315-57. PubMed ID: 21847884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intended and unintended consequences of the gabapentin off-label marketing lawsuit among patients with bipolar disorder.
    Chace MJ; Zhang F; Fullerton CA; Huskamp HA; Gilden D; Soumerai SB
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2012 Nov; 73(11):1388-94. PubMed ID: 23146199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. False Claims Act prosecution did not deter off-label drug use in the case of neurontin.
    Kesselheim AS; Darby D; Studdert DM; Glynn R; Levin R; Avorn J
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 Dec; 30(12):2318-27. PubMed ID: 22147859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An unhealthy disregard.
    Nat Med; 2010 Jun; 16(6):609. PubMed ID: 20526289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.