These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23234500)

  • 1. Null category-length and target-lure relatedness effects in episodic recognition: a constraint on item-noise interference models.
    Cho KW; Neely JH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1331-55. PubMed ID: 23234500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Category length produces an inverted-U discriminability function in episodic recognition memory.
    Neely JH; Tse CS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1141-72. PubMed ID: 19048453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Memory evaluation in mild cognitive impairment using recall and recognition tests.
    Bennett IJ; Golob EJ; Parker ES; Starr A
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2006 Nov; 28(8):1408-22. PubMed ID: 17050267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory.
    Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Sep; 24(5):1105-20. PubMed ID: 9747525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociative effects of phonological vs. semantic associates on recognition memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
    Tse CS; Li Y; Neill WT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 21377636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A negative semantic similarity effect on short-term order memory: evidence from recency judgements.
    Tse CS
    Memory; 2010 Aug; 18(6):638-56. PubMed ID: 20687000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: a comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001).
    Criss AH; Shiffrin RM
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jul; 111(3):800-7. PubMed ID: 15250785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus type and the list strength paradigm.
    Osth AF; Dennis S; Kinnell A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1826-41. PubMed ID: 24579878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrieval-induced forgetting in a category recognition task.
    Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):286-91. PubMed ID: 19210100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Insights from child development on the relationship between episodic and semantic memory.
    Robertson EK; Köhler S
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Nov; 45(14):3178-89. PubMed ID: 17707443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test sequence priming in recognition memory.
    Johns EE; Mewhort DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1162-74. PubMed ID: 19686012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of childhood bilingualism on episodic and semantic memory tasks.
    Kormi-Nouri R; Shojaei RS; Moniri S; Gholami AR; Moradi AR; Akbari-Zardkhaneh S; Nilsson LG
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Apr; 49(2):93-109. PubMed ID: 18352979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Separating sensitivity from response bias: implications of comparisons of yes-no and forced-choice tests for models and measures of recognition memory.
    Kroll NE; Yonelinas AP; Dobbins IG; Frederick CM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):241-54. PubMed ID: 12049242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Item and order memory for novel visual patterns assessed by two-choice recognition.
    Avons SE; Ward G; Melling L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jul; 57(5):865-91. PubMed ID: 15204121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociative contributions of semantic and lexical-phonological information to immediate recognition.
    Nishiyama R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):642-8. PubMed ID: 22774851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition.
    Dodd MD; Sheard ED; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 16423748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sources of interference in item and associative recognition memory.
    Osth AF; Dennis S
    Psychol Rev; 2015 Apr; 122(2):260-311. PubMed ID: 25730734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metacognitive control and spaced practice: clarifying what people do and why.
    Toppino TC; Cohen MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1480-91. PubMed ID: 20822306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Category-length and category-strength effects using images of scenes.
    Baumann O; Vromen JMG; Boddy AC; Crawshaw E; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1234-1247. PubMed ID: 29931621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the role of individual items in recognition memory and metacognition: challenges for signal detection theory.
    Busey TA; Arici A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1123-36. PubMed ID: 19686009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.