These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2323502)

  • 21. Teaching scientific integrity.
    Gifford F
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9219021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research.
    Steinberg NA
    South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tougher crackdown on fraud needed.
    del Guercio P
    Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6696):823. PubMed ID: 9732860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rights to due process in instances of possible scientific misconduct.
    Hallum JV; Hadley SW
    Endocrinology; 1991 Feb; 128(2):643-4. PubMed ID: 1989853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The logical geography of concepts and shared responsibilities concerning research misconduct.
    Guenin LM
    Acad Med; 1996 Jun; 71(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 9125915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The end of the Baltimore saga.
    Nature; 1991 May; 351(6322):85. PubMed ID: 2030733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of data audits in detecting scientific misconduct.
    JAMA; 1990 Jul; 264(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 2192092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Off with their heads: the need to criminalize some forms of scientific misconduct.
    Redman BK; Caplan AL
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 16083091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The outsider: the rogue scientist as terrorist.
    Flower RJ
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Apr; 40(4):282-3. PubMed ID: 23408708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. University clears scientist of misconduct but says his conduct was misbehaviour.
    Parry J
    BMJ; 2006 Feb; 332(7538):382. PubMed ID: 16484251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Committee planned to weigh misconduct in Australia.
    Grose S
    Nat Med; 2010 Jun; 16(6):620. PubMed ID: 20526302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dealing with scientific misconduct.
    Bosch X
    BMJ; 2007 Sep; 335(7619):524-5. PubMed ID: 17855286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. We deserve a government that respects scientific integrity.
    Russell E
    CMAJ; 2015 Oct; 187(15):1107. PubMed ID: 26391718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Freedom and responsibility.
    Breithaupt H
    EMBO Rep; 2011 Jul; 12(8):744. PubMed ID: 21799525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Research misconduct: Dr Grethe Stoa Birketvedt not guilty of scientific misconduct.
    Florholmen J; Leeds AR
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Jun; 103(6):214. PubMed ID: 20513898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Scientific misconduct. Sabotaged scientist sues Yale and her lab chief.
    Enserink M
    Science; 2014 Mar; 343(6175):1065-6. PubMed ID: 24604172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Research misconduct in the UK.
    Godlee F; Wager E
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d8357. PubMed ID: 22218103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Misconduct: acceptable practices differ by field.
    Grinnell F
    Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7052):776. PubMed ID: 16094343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.