These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23235861)

  • 1. Research methods: Know when your numbers are significant.
    Vaux DL
    Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7428):180-1. PubMed ID: 23235861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Making an impact.
    Wu R
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6979):206-7. PubMed ID: 15014507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to write a paper: revising your manuscript.
    Su'a B; MacFater WS; Hill AG
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Mar; 87(3):195-197. PubMed ID: 27905185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transparency showcases strength of peer review.
    Pulverer B
    Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):29-31. PubMed ID: 21048742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Academics seek to cast peer review as a public service.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6995):7. PubMed ID: 15229573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why and how to avoid a desk-rejection.
    Lake ET
    Res Nurs Health; 2020 Apr; 43(2):141-142. PubMed ID: 32103510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Any jackass can trash a manuscript, but it takes good scholarship to create one (how MBoC promotes civil and constructive peer review).
    Drubin DG
    Mol Biol Cell; 2011 Mar; 22(5):525-7. PubMed ID: 21357757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review: Close inspection.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2016 May; 533(7602):279-81. PubMed ID: 27200447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Training peer reviewers.
    Mackey DA
    Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7113):880. PubMed ID: 17106961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer reviewers need more nurturing.
    Catlow R
    Nature; 2017 Dec; 552(7685):293. PubMed ID: 29293240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Taking responsibility for scientific discourse.
    Friedman SD
    Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5892):1039-40. PubMed ID: 18719265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer Review Process, Editorial Decisions, and Manuscript Resubmission: A Reference for Novice Researchers.
    Lusher AD
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2015 Sep; 115(9):566-9. PubMed ID: 26322935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recruiters and academia. Top 10 tips for success in graduate school.
    de Lanerolle P
    Nature; 2005 Jan; 433(7024):442. PubMed ID: 15674299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discourse among referees and editors would help.
    Lahiri DK
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Academic recruitment in Spain and Italy.
    Gui D; Runfola M; Rossi S; Panunzi S; De Gaetano A
    Science; 2002 Aug; 297(5582):770-1. PubMed ID: 12162319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What's next for Registered Reports?
    Chambers C
    Nature; 2019 Sep; 573(7773):187-189. PubMed ID: 31506624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):171. PubMed ID: 29895918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standards in the face of uncertainty--peer review is flawed and under-researched, but the best we have.
    Mertens S; Baethge C
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2012 Dec; 109(51-52):900-2. PubMed ID: 23372614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Checklists work to improve science.
    Nature; 2018 Apr; 556(7701):273-274. PubMed ID: 30967653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. To do today.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7060):922-3. PubMed ID: 16229071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.