189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23236270)
1. SnIPRE: selection inference using a Poisson random effects model.
Eilertson KE; Booth JG; Bustamante CD
PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(12):e1002806. PubMed ID: 23236270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical inference of selection and divergence from a time-dependent Poisson random field model.
Amei A; Sawyer S
PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e34413. PubMed ID: 22509300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence for diploid selection models with arbitrary dominance.
Williamson S; Fledel-Alon A; Bustamante CD
Genetics; 2004 Sep; 168(1):463-75. PubMed ID: 15454557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identifying Lineage-Specific Targets of Natural Selection by a Bayesian Analysis of Genomic Polymorphisms and Divergence from Multiple Species.
Zhao S; Zhang T; Liu Q; Wu H; Su B; Shi P; Chen H
Mol Biol Evol; 2019 Jun; 36(6):1302-1315. PubMed ID: 30840083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian analysis suggests that most amino acid replacements in Drosophila are driven by positive selection.
Sawyer SA; Kulathinal RJ; Bustamante CD; Hartl DL
J Mol Evol; 2003; 57 Suppl 1():S154-64. PubMed ID: 15008412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Codon Usage Selection Can Bias Estimation of the Fraction of Adaptive Amino Acid Fixations.
Matsumoto T; John A; Baeza-Centurion P; Li B; Akashi H
Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jun; 33(6):1580-9. PubMed ID: 26873577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evolution of the human immunodeficiency virus envelope gene is dominated by purifying selection.
Edwards CT; Holmes EC; Pybus OG; Wilson DJ; Viscidi RP; Abrams EJ; Phillips RE; Drummond AJ
Genetics; 2006 Nov; 174(3):1441-53. PubMed ID: 16951087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence under fluctuating selection.
Huerta-Sanchez E; Durrett R; Bustamante CD
Genetics; 2008 Jan; 178(1):325-37. PubMed ID: 17947441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans.
Beaumont MA; Balding DJ
Mol Ecol; 2004 Apr; 13(4):969-80. PubMed ID: 15012769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing INLA and OpenBUGS for hierarchical Poisson modeling in disease mapping.
Carroll R; Lawson AB; Faes C; Kirby RS; Aregay M; Watjou K
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2015; 14-15():45-54. PubMed ID: 26530822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classical and Bayesian inference for the discrete Poisson Ramos-Louzada distribution with application to COVID-19 data.
Alkhairy I
Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Jun; 20(8):14061-14080. PubMed ID: 37679125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods for estimating the distribution of selective effects among classes of mutations using DNA polymorphism data.
Bustamante CD; Nielsen R; Hartl DL
Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Mar; 63(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 12615493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Bayesian model comparison approach to inferring positive selection.
Scheffler K; Seoighe C
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2531-40. PubMed ID: 16120799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inferring the fitness effects of DNA mutations from polymorphism and divergence data: statistical power to detect directional selection under stationarity and free recombination.
Akashi H
Genetics; 1999 Jan; 151(1):221-38. PubMed ID: 9872962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. impMKT: the imputed McDonald and Kreitman test, a straightforward correction that significantly increases the evidence of positive selection of the McDonald and Kreitman test at the gene level.
Murga-Moreno J; Coronado-Zamora M; Casillas S; Barbadilla A
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 35976111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inferring the distribution of selective effects from a time inhomogeneous model.
Amei A; Zhou S
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0194709. PubMed ID: 30657757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecular evolution of the Bovini tribe (Bovidae, Bovinae): is there evidence of rapid evolution or reduced selective constraint in Domestic cattle?
MacEachern S; McEwan J; McCulloch A; Mather A; Savin K; Goddard M
BMC Genomics; 2009 Apr; 10():179. PubMed ID: 19393048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why time matters: codon evolution and the temporal dynamics of dN/dS.
Mugal CF; Wolf JB; Kaj I
Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Jan; 31(1):212-31. PubMed ID: 24129904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Not so different after all: a comparison of methods for detecting amino acid sites under selection.
Kosakovsky Pond SL; Frost SD
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1208-22. PubMed ID: 15703242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
