These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2323694)

  • 1. [A new strategy for automated static perimetry].
    Weber J
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 2323694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Perimetry with normal Octopus technique and Weber 'dynamic' technique. Initial results with reference to reproducibility of measurements in glaucoma patients].
    Zulauf M; Fehlmann P; Flammer J
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 8963141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test time and efficiency of the dynamic strategy in glaucoma perimetry.
    Weber J; Klimaschka T
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jan; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 7612076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age-dependent normative values for differential luminance sensitivity in automated static perimetry using the Octopus 101.
    Hermann A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Rauscher S; Schiefer U
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 86(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 18070224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perimetry update.
    Leydhecker W
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1983 Jun; 15(6):511-5, 520-1, 524-6 passim. PubMed ID: 6571428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Automated flicker perimetry].
    Lachenmayr B; Gleissner M; Rothbächer H
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1989; 86(6):695-701. PubMed ID: 2625301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Computer program controlled perimetry, its advantages and disadvantages].
    Herbolzheimer WG
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1986 Oct; 189(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 3807218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Specificity of suprathreshold test methods in automated perimetry].
    De Natale R; Gramer E; Krieglstein GK
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1985 Feb; 186(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 3839032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of faulty refraction and artificial media opacities on visual acuity perimetry].
    Hölzl MJ; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 1794825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Automated measurement of distance vision based on the DIN strategy].
    Effert R; Steinmetz H; Jansen W; Rau G; Reim M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1989 Jul; 195(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 2796232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
    Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Sources of error in automated static perimetry].
    Rabineau PA; Flammer J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1989 May; 194(5):307-19. PubMed ID: 2747125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative study of various perimetry strategies].
    Vivell PM; Lachenmayr BJ; Zimmermann P
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(6):819-23. PubMed ID: 1794812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Pupillographic perimetry using the "Octopus"].
    Alexandridis E; Krastel H
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1989; 86(6):692-4. PubMed ID: 2625300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
    Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Automated perimetry].
    Flammer J
    Ther Umsch; 1990 Apr; 47(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 2191463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing.
    Wall M; Punke SG; Stickney TL; Brito CF; Withrow KR; Kardon RH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining perimetric suprathreshold and threshold procedures to reduce measurement variability in areas of visual field loss.
    McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 15630403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.