These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23238928)

  • 1. Physiological employment standards IV: integration of women in combat units physiological and medical considerations.
    Epstein Y; Yanovich R; Moran DS; Heled Y
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2013 Nov; 113(11):2673-90. PubMed ID: 23238928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physiological and Medical Aspects That Put Women Soldiers at Increased Risk for Overuse Injuries.
    Epstein Y; Fleischmann C; Yanovich R; Heled Y
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S107-10. PubMed ID: 26506172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physical Training Strategies for Military Women's Performance Optimization in Combat-Centric Occupations.
    Nindl BC
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S101-6. PubMed ID: 26506171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physiological Employment Standards III: physiological challenges and consequences encountered during international military deployments.
    Nindl BC; Castellani JW; Warr BJ; Sharp MA; Henning PC; Spiering BA; Scofield DE
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2013 Nov; 113(11):2655-72. PubMed ID: 23430237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Physiological aspects of women in combat].
    Libster D; Heled Y; Shapiro Y; Epstein Y
    Harefuah; 1999 Dec; 137(11):521-5, 592. PubMed ID: 10959362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physiological Implications, Performance Assessment and Risk Mitigation Strategies of Women in Combat-Centric Occupations.
    Greeves JP
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S94-100. PubMed ID: 26506206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Operational Physical Performance and Fitness in Military Women: Physiological, Musculoskeletal Injury, and Optimized Physical Training Considerations for Successfully Integrating Women Into Combat-Centric Military Occupations.
    Nindl BC; Jones BH; Van Arsdale SJ; Kelly K; Kraemer WJ
    Mil Med; 2016 Jan; 181(1 Suppl):50-62. PubMed ID: 26741902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Musculoskeletal, biomechanical, and physiological gender differences in the US military.
    Allison KF; Keenan KA; Sell TC; Abt JP; Nagai T; Deluzio J; McGrail M; Lephart SM
    US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():22-32. PubMed ID: 26101903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physiological Demands and Characteristics of Movement During Simulated Combat.
    Larsson J; Olsson MC; Bremander A; Dencker M
    Mil Med; 2023 Nov; 188(11-12):3496-3505. PubMed ID: 35678321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional physical training improves women's military occupational performance.
    Nindl BC; Eagle SR; Frykman PN; Palmer C; Lammi E; Reynolds K; Allison K; Harman E
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S91-S97. PubMed ID: 28986086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lower-body muscular power predicts performance on urban combat simulation.
    Sankari M; Vaara JP; Pihlainen K; Ojanen T; Kyröläinen H
    Work; 2024; 77(4):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 38517830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and application of a questionnaire to self-rate physical work demands for ground combat soldiers.
    Larsson J; Dencker M; Olsson MC; Bremander A
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Feb; 83():103002. PubMed ID: 31747636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex differences in the physical performance, physiological, and psycho-cognitive responses to military operational stress.
    Conkright WR; O'Leary TJ; Wardle SL; Greeves JP; Beckner ME; Nindl BC
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2022 Jan; 22(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 33840352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex and age differences in physical performance: A comparison of Army basic training and operational populations.
    Dada EO; Anderson MK; Grier T; Alemany JA; Jones BH
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S68-S73. PubMed ID: 29100826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current considerations related to physiological differences between the sexes and physical employment standards.
    Roberts D; Gebhardt DL; Gaskill SE; Roy TC; Sharp MA
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2016 Jun; 41(6 Suppl 2):S108-20. PubMed ID: 27277561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance differences between male and female marines on standardized physical fitness tests and combat proxy tasks: identifying the gap.
    Jameson J; Pappa L; McGuire B; Kelly KR
    US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():12-21. PubMed ID: 26159007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Role of Gender and Physical Performance on Injuries: An Army Study.
    Anderson MK; Grier T; Dada EO; Canham-Chervak M; Jones BH
    Am J Prev Med; 2017 May; 52(5):e131-e138. PubMed ID: 28012810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of cross-training on fitness and injury in women.
    Grier T; Canham-Chervak M; Anderson MK; Bushman TT; Jones BH
    US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():33-41. PubMed ID: 26101904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk factors for training-related injuries among men and women in basic combat training.
    Knapik JJ; Sharp MA; Canham-Chervak M; Hauret K; Patton JF; Jones BH
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2001 Jun; 33(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Load carriage, human performance, and employment standards.
    Taylor NA; Peoples GE; Petersen SR
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2016 Jun; 41(6 Suppl 2):S131-47. PubMed ID: 27277563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.