These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23239064)

  • 1. A discrimination-association model for decomposing component processes of the implicit association test.
    Stefanutti L; Robusto E; Vianello M; Anselmi P
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):393-404. PubMed ID: 23239064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GRace: a MATLAB-based application for fitting the discrimination-association model.
    Stefanutti L; Vianello M; Anselmi P; Robusto E
    Span J Psychol; 2014 Oct; 17():E73. PubMed ID: 26054728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does discrimination beat association in the IAT? The discrimination-association model reconceived.
    Stefanutti L; Robusto E; Vianello M; Anselmi P; Dalla Rosa A; Bar-Anan Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Aug; 52(4):1640-1656. PubMed ID: 32162277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discriminating between the effects of valence and salience in the Implicit Association Test.
    Chang BP; Mitchell CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Nov; 64(11):2251-75. PubMed ID: 21722058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Process components of the Implicit Association Test: a diffusion-model analysis.
    Klauer KC; Voss A; Schmitz F; Teige-Mocigemba S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Sep; 93(3):353-68. PubMed ID: 17723053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the contributions of associations and recoding in the Implicit Association Test: the ReAL model for the IAT.
    Meissner F; Rothermund K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Jan; 104(1):45-69. PubMed ID: 23148698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When old and frail is not the same: dissociating category and stimulus effects in four implicit attitude measurement methods.
    Gast A; Rothermund K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):479-98. PubMed ID: 19606404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimizing the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: the Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF).
    Rothermund K; Teige-Mocigemba S; Gast A; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):84-98. PubMed ID: 18609400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing fluency as a predictor of salience asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test.
    Chang BP; Mitchell CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2030-54. PubMed ID: 19253092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time-dependent Poisson counter models of response latency in simple judgment.
    Smith PL; Van Zandt T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2000 Nov; 53 ( Pt 2)():293-315. PubMed ID: 11109709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intentional faking of the single category Implicit Association Test and the Implicit Association Test.
    Stieger S; Göritz AS; Hergovich A; Voracek M
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):219-30. PubMed ID: 22049663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trying to separate the wheat from the chaff: Construct- and faking-related variance on the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
    Röhner J; Ewers T
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):243-58. PubMed ID: 25701107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disentangling recoding processes and evaluative associations in a gender attitude implicit association test among adult males.
    Jin Z
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; 69(11):2276-84. PubMed ID: 26933754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding the role of executive control in the implicit association test: why flexible people have small IAT effects.
    Klauer KC; Schmitz F; Teige-Mocigemba S; Voss A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):595-619. PubMed ID: 19672797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applying the Implicit Association Test to Measure Intolerance of Uncertainty.
    Mosca O; Dentale F; Lauriola M; Leone L
    Psychol Rep; 2016 Aug; 119(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 27451266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociating implicit wanting from implicit liking: Development and validation of the Wanting Implicit Association Test (W-IAT).
    Koranyi N; Grigutsch LA; Algermissen J; Rothermund K
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Mar; 54():165-169. PubMed ID: 27568276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An ontological test of the IAT: Self-activation can increase predictive validity.
    Perugini M; O'Gorman R; Prestwich A
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(2):134-47. PubMed ID: 17472097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the impact of replication on implicit association test effect by means of the extended logistic model for the assessment of change.
    Robusto E; Cristante F; Vianello M
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):954-60. PubMed ID: 19001386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clocking the social mind by identifying mental processes in the IAT with electrical neuroimaging.
    Schiller B; Gianotti LR; Baumgartner T; Nash K; Koenig T; Knoch D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(10):2786-91. PubMed ID: 26903643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conflict monitoring and stimulus categorization processes involved in the prosocial attitude implicit association test: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Xiao F; Zheng Z; Wang Y; Cui J; Chen Y
    Soc Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 10(4):408-17. PubMed ID: 25623088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.