These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23239065)

  • 1. Voice attractiveness: influence of stimulus duration and type.
    Ferdenzi C; Patel S; Mehu-Blantar I; Khidasheli M; Sander D; Delplanque S
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):405-13. PubMed ID: 23239065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Pitch Manipulation on Male Ratings of Female Speakers and Their Voices.
    Krumpholz C; Quigley C; Ameen K; Reuter C; Fusani L; Leder H
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():911854. PubMed ID: 35874336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of femininity and averageness of voice pitch in aesthetic judgments of women's voices.
    Feinberg DR; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
    Perception; 2008; 37(4):615-23. PubMed ID: 18546667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prosodic finality and sentence type in French.
    Smith CL
    Lang Speech; 2002 Jun; 45(Pt 2):141-78. PubMed ID: 12613559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of an Open Jaw Posture on Vowel Perception in the Aging Voice.
    Mautner HD
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):772.e23-772.e32. PubMed ID: 26743608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking.
    Baker RS; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):523-533. PubMed ID: 29602344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs.
    Watts CR; Awan SN; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):387.e1-387.e10. PubMed ID: 27751661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of different voice samples for perceptual analysis.
    Revis J; Giovanni A; Wuyts F; Triglia J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1999; 51(3):108-16. PubMed ID: 10394058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task.
    Brockmann M; Drinnan MJ; Storck C; Carding PN
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Influence of Voice Sample Length in the Auditory-Perceptual Judgment of Overall Voice Quality.
    Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):202-210. PubMed ID: 27539001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards a more nuanced view of vocal attractiveness.
    Babel M; McGuire G; King J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88616. PubMed ID: 24586358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences.
    Choi JM; Purcell DW; Coyne JA; Aiken SJ
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):637-50. PubMed ID: 23575462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Androstadienone's influence on the perception of facial and vocal attractiveness is not sex specific.
    Ferdenzi C; Delplanque S; Atanassova R; Sander D
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2016 Apr; 66():166-75. PubMed ID: 26827295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality.
    Bele IV
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):555-73. PubMed ID: 16301102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of vocal intensity and vowel type on cepstral analysis of voice.
    Awan SN; Giovinco A; Owens J
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):670.e15-20. PubMed ID: 22480754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positive association between vocal and facial attractiveness in women but not in men: A cross-cultural study.
    Valentova JV; Varella MA; Havlíček J; Kleisner K
    Behav Processes; 2017 Feb; 135():95-100. PubMed ID: 27986472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of anchor modality on the reliability of vocal severity ratings.
    Awan SN; Lawson LL
    J Voice; 2009 May; 23(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 18346869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The stop voicing contrast in French sentences: contextual sensitivity of vowel duration, closure duration, voice onset time, stop release and closure voicing.
    Abdelli-Beruh NB
    Phonetica; 2004; 61(4):201-19. PubMed ID: 15824487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Your Cheatin' Voice Will Tell on You: Detection of Past Infidelity from Voice.
    Hughes SM; Harrison MA
    Evol Psychol; 2017; 15(2):1474704917711513. PubMed ID: 28580806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.