131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2323923)
1. The COMPLY computer program for demonstrating compliance with national radionuclide air emission standards.
Colli A; Beal S; Loomis D
Health Phys; 1990 Apr; 58(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 2323923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of results for the University of Missouri Research Reactor radiological airborne release assessments obtained from PC-based computer programs.
Rong X; Kutikkad K; Langhorst SM
Health Phys; 1995 Jun; 68(6):845-50. PubMed ID: 7759266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's CAP88 PC Versions 3.0 and 4.0.
Jannik T; Farfan EB; Dixon K; Newton J; Sailors C; Johnson L; Moore K; Stahman R
Health Phys; 2015 Aug; 109(2 Suppl 2):S169-75. PubMed ID: 26102326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of radionuclide databases in CAP88 mainframe version 1.0 and Windows-based version 3.0.
LaBone ED; Farfán EB; Lee PL; Jannik GT; Donnelly EH; Foley TQ
Health Phys; 2009 Sep; 97(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 19667807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EPA's proposed radionuclide emission standards stir up opposition.
Tilyou SM
J Nucl Med; 1989 Sep; 30(9):1435-9, 1442-3. PubMed ID: 2769402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An application of the NCRP screening techniques to atmospheric radon releases from the former feed materials production center near Fernald, Ohio. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.
Miller CW
Health Phys; 1999 Nov; 77(5):545-55. PubMed ID: 10524509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of dose results from the Clean Air Act Assessment Package-1988, personal computer (CAP88-PC), version 3 to previous versions.
Rhoads K; Snyder S; Staven L
Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S125-39. PubMed ID: 23803666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oak Ridge Reservation Environmental Protection Rad Neshaps Radionuclide Inventory Web Database and Rad Neshaps Source and Dose Database.
Scofield PA; Smith LL; Johnson DN
Health Phys; 2017 Jul; 113(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 28542014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling Considerations for Ingestion Pathway Dose Calculations Using CAP88.
Stuenkel D
Health Phys; 2017 Apr; 112(4):343-351. PubMed ID: 28234693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A best fit approach to estimating multiple diffuse source terms using ambient air monitoring data and an air dispersion model.
MacQueen D; Bertoldo N; Wegrecki A
Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S140-8. PubMed ID: 23803667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A discussion of the U.S. EPA methodology for determining Water Quality Standards (WQS).
Burmaster DE; von Stackelberg KE
Qual Assur; 1992 Jun; 1(3):192-206. PubMed ID: 1344674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Guidelines for radiation protection.
Murphy PH
Semin Nucl Med; 1986 Apr; 16(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 3961514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose Comparisons for a Site-specific Representative Person Using the Age-dependent Dose Coefficients in CAP88-PC Version 4.
Stagich BH; Moore KR; Newton JR; Dixon KL; Jannik GT
Health Phys; 2017 Apr; 112(4):338-342. PubMed ID: 28234692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of NCRP air screening factors for evaluating both routine and episodic radionuclide releases to the atmosphere.
Mohler HJ; Meyer KR; Grogan HA; Aanenson JW; Till JE
Health Phys; 2004 Feb; 86(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 14744046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EPA's control technology approach to assisting states and regions with air toxics problems: five case studies.
Nolen SL; Dimmick WF
Toxicol Ind Health; 1990 Oct; 6(5):257-67. PubMed ID: 2274989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of CAP88 PC Ver. 3.0 and MAXDOSE dose assessment models involving co-located stack releases at the Savannah River site.
Farfán E; Jannik GT; Lee P; Powell A
Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S158-63. PubMed ID: 23803669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lauriston S. Taylor Lecture: Yucca mountain radiation standards, dose/risk assessments, thinking outside the box, evaluations, and recommendations.
Moeller DW
Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):376-91. PubMed ID: 19820447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of EPA's QMS to SEI's CMMI.
Mills P; Braun L; Marohl D
Qual Assur; 2001; 9(3-4):165-71. PubMed ID: 12553079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors affecting dose estimates for long-term performance assessments: case study-Armagosa Valley.
Moeller DW; Ryan MT; Sun LS
Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 17220714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulatory experience in applying a radiological environmental protection framework for existing and planned nuclear facilities.
Mihok S; Thompson P
Ann ICRP; 2012; 41(3-4):256-62. PubMed ID: 23089024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
