137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23239693)
1. Scatter radiation intensities around full-field digital mammography units.
Judge MA; Keavey E; Phelan N
Br J Radiol; 2013 Jan; 86(1021):20120130. PubMed ID: 23239693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scatter radiation intensities around a clinical digital breast tomosynthesis unit and the impact on radiation shielding considerations.
Yang K; Li X; Liu B
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1096-110. PubMed ID: 26936697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation shielding calculation for digital breast tomosynthesis rooms with an updated workload survey.
Yang K; Schultz TJ; Li X; Liu B
J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):230-246. PubMed ID: 28141582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are phantoms useful for predicting the potential of dose reduction in full-field digital mammography?
Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(8):1851-70. PubMed ID: 15815100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of scatter reduction method and monochromatic beams on image quality and dose in mammography.
Moeckli R; Verdun FR; Fiedler S; Pachoud M; Bulling S; Schnyder P; Valley JF
Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3156-64. PubMed ID: 14713082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scatter rejection in multislit digital mammography.
Aslund M; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Danielsson M
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):933-40. PubMed ID: 16696469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Establishment of scatter factors for use in shielding calculations and risk assessment for computed tomography facilities.
Wallace H; Martin CJ; Sutton DG; Peet D; Williams JR
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 22327169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of shielding requirements for mammography.
Okunade AA; Ademoroti OA
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1210-8. PubMed ID: 15191311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SCATTER RADIATION INTENSITIES IN HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL PLANES ABOUT DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS SYSTEM.
Varcoe JG; Barnes P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 Feb; 198(1-2):119-127. PubMed ID: 35137230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of scatter and an antiscatter grid on the performance of a slot-scanning digital mammography system.
Shen SZ; Bloomquist AK; Mawdsley GE; Yaffe MJ; Elbakri I
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1108-15. PubMed ID: 16696488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Dose reduction through gridless technique in digital full-field mammography].
Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Berzeg S; Bick U; Fischer T; Hamm B
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 12811688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physical characterization of a scanning photon counting digital mammography system based on Si-strip detectors.
Aslund M; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Danielsson M
Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):1918-25. PubMed ID: 17654894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of the influence of anode and filter materials on primary shielding requirements for mammography.
Okunade AA
Health Phys; 2005 Feb; 88(2 Suppl):S44-52. PubMed ID: 15654245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric and image quality comparison of two digital mammography units with different target/filter combinations: Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, W/Rh, W/Ag.
Emanuelli S; Rizzi E; Amerio S; Fasano C; Cesarani F
Radiol Med; 2011 Mar; 116(2):310-8. PubMed ID: 21225367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full-field digital mammography units.
Hauge IH; Hogg P; Szczepura K; Connolly P; McGill G; Mercer C
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):263-71. PubMed ID: 22225296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applicability of ACR breast dosimetry methodology to a digital mammography system.
Tomon JJ; Johnson TE; Swenson KN; Schauer DA
Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):799-807. PubMed ID: 16878582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. X-ray scattering in full-field digital mammography.
Nykänen K; Siltanen S
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1864-73. PubMed ID: 12906205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
