These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23239695)

  • 1. Pressure and breast thickness in mammography--an exploratory calibration study.
    Hogg P; Taylor M; Szczepura K; Mercer C; Denton E
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Jan; 86(1021):20120222. PubMed ID: 23239695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure and breast thickness in mammography--what about physics?
    Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130208. PubMed ID: 23690437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pressure and breast thickness in mammography--what about physics? Author reply.
    Hogg P; Taylor M; Szczepura K; Mercer C; Denton E
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130267. PubMed ID: 23690439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Error analysis of calibration materials on dual-energy mammography.
    Mou X; Chen X
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):596-603. PubMed ID: 18044617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effective x-ray attenuation coefficient measurements from two full field digital mammography systems for data calibration applications.
    Heine JJ; Thomas JA
    Biomed Eng Online; 2008 Mar; 7():13. PubMed ID: 18373863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-energy digital mammography: calibration and inverse-mapping techniques to estimate calcification thickness and glandular-tissue ratio.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1110-7. PubMed ID: 12852535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using a NPWE model observer to assess suitable image quality for a digital mammography quality assurance programme.
    Monnin P; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):459-62. PubMed ID: 20395413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
    Sheybani EO; Sankar R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of reduced breast compression in breast tomosynthesis: human observer study using clinical cases.
    Förnvik D; Andersson I; Svahn T; Timberg P; Zackrisson S; Tingberg A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):118-23. PubMed ID: 20228049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of breast arterial calcification using full field digital mammography.
    Molloi S; Xu T; Ducote J; Iribarren C
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1428-39. PubMed ID: 18491538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography.
    Balleyguier C; Cousin M; Dunant A; Attard M; Delaloge S; Arfi-Rouche J
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 103():137-142. PubMed ID: 30223227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full-field digital mammography units.
    Hauge IH; Hogg P; Szczepura K; Connolly P; McGill G; Mercer C
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):263-71. PubMed ID: 22225296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
    Liu X; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Geiser WR; Shen Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6489-501. PubMed ID: 22149832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
    Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A method to measure paddle and detector pressures and footprints in mammography.
    Hogg P; Szczepura K; Darlington A; Maxwell A
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041907. PubMed ID: 23556901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of a compression paddle on energy response, calibration and measurement with mammographic dosimeters using ionization chambers and solid-state detectors.
    Hourdakis CJ; Boziari A; Koumbouli E
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):1047-59. PubMed ID: 19168939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographic compression--a need for mechanical standardization.
    Branderhorst W; de Groot JE; Highnam R; Chan A; Böhm-Vélez M; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 84(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 25596915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of breast compression on mass conspicuity in digital mammography.
    Saunders RS; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4464-73. PubMed ID: 18975694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.