142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23239953)
1. Poisson noise obscures hypometabolic lesions in PET.
Kerr WT; Lau EP
Yale J Biol Med; 2012 Dec; 85(4):541-9. PubMed ID: 23239953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noise spatial nonuniformity and the impact of statistical image reconstruction in CT myocardial perfusion imaging.
Lauzier PT; Tang J; Speidel MA; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4079-92. PubMed ID: 22830741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noise and signal decoupling in maximum-likelihood reconstructions and Metz filters for PET brain images.
Liow JS; Strother SC
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Apr; 39(4):735-50. PubMed ID: 15552081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Compressed sensing for reduction of noise and artefacts in direct PET image reconstruction.
Richter D; Basse-Lüsebrink TC; Kampf T; Fischer A; Israel I; Schneider M; Jakob PM; Samnick S
Z Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 24(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 23756331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the spline reconstruction technique for PET.
Kastis GA; Kyriakopoulou D; Gaitanis A; Fernández Y; Hutton BF; Fokas AS
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042501. PubMed ID: 24694154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noise correlation in PET, CT, SPECT and PET/CT data evaluated using autocorrelation function: a phantom study on data, reconstructed using FBP and OSEM.
Razifar P; Sandström M; Schnieder H; Långström B; Maripuu E; Bengtsson E; Bergström M
BMC Med Imaging; 2005 Aug; 5():5. PubMed ID: 16122383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noise reduction in oncology FDG PET images by iterative reconstruction: a quantitative assessment.
Riddell C; Carson RE; Carrasquillo JA; Libutti SK; Danforth DN; Whatley M; Bacharach SL
J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 42(9):1316-23. PubMed ID: 11535719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An improved ordered subsets expectation maximization positron emission computerized tomography reconstruction.
Chen H; Lei X; Yao D
Comput Biol Med; 2007 Dec; 37(12):1780-5. PubMed ID: 17624322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative accuracy of MAP reconstruction for dynamic PET imaging in small animals.
Cheng JC; Shoghi K; Laforest R
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1029-41. PubMed ID: 22320813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective noise-suppressed and artifact-reduced reconstruction of SPECT data using a preconditioned alternating projection algorithm.
Li S; Zhang J; Krol A; Schmidtlein CR; Vogelsang L; Shen L; Lipson E; Feiglin D; Xu Y
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4872-87. PubMed ID: 26233214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimisation of the OS-EM algorithm and comparison with FBP for image reconstruction on a dual-head camera: a phantom and a clinical 18F-FDG study.
Gutman F; Gardin I; Delahaye N; Rakotonirina H; Hitzel A; Manrique A; Le Guludec D; Véra P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 14579091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Properties of noise in positron emission tomography images reconstructed with filtered-backprojection and row-action maximum likelihood algorithm.
Teymurazyan A; Riauka T; Jans HS; Robinson D
J Digit Imaging; 2013 Jun; 26(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 22850933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of image reconstruction algorithm on neurotransmission PET studies in humans: comparison between filtered backprojection and ordered subsets expectation maximization.
Morimoto T; Ito H; Takano A; Ikoma Y; Seki C; Okauchi T; Tanimoto K; Ando A; Shiraishi T; Yamaya T; Suhara T
Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Apr; 20(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 16715957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The image quality of FBP and MLEM reconstruction.
Wieczorek H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):3161-76. PubMed ID: 20479513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image reconstruction for positron emission tomography based on patch-based regularization and dictionary learning.
Zhang W; Gao J; Yang Y; Liang D; Liu X; Zheng H; Hu Z
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5014-5026. PubMed ID: 31494950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of a noise-weighted filtered backprojection algorithm with the Standard MLEM algorithm for poisson noise.
Zeng GL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 24159012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using an external gating signal to estimate noise in PET with an emphasis on tracer avid tumors.
Schmidtlein CR; Beattie BJ; Bailey DL; Akhurst TJ; Wang W; Gönen M; Kirov AS; Humm JL
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Oct; 55(20):6299-326. PubMed ID: 20924132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of basis functions for 3D PET reconstruction using a Monte Carlo system matrix.
Cabello J; Rafecas M
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1759-77. PubMed ID: 22407258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
