188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23239984)
1. Using RosettaLigand for small molecule docking into comparative models.
Kaufmann KW; Meiler J
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e50769. PubMed ID: 23239984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. RosettaLigand docking with full ligand and receptor flexibility.
Davis IW; Baker D
J Mol Biol; 2009 Jan; 385(2):381-92. PubMed ID: 19041878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fully Flexible Docking of Medium Sized Ligand Libraries with RosettaLigand.
DeLuca S; Khar K; Meiler J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132508. PubMed ID: 26207742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards ligand docking including explicit interface water molecules.
Lemmon G; Meiler J
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e67536. PubMed ID: 23840735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computational design of protein-small molecule interfaces.
Allison B; Combs S; DeLuca S; Lemmon G; Mizoue L; Meiler J
J Struct Biol; 2014 Feb; 185(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 23962892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative Evaluation of Covalent Docking Tools.
Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jul; 58(7):1441-1458. PubMed ID: 29890081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benchmarking GPCR homology model template selection in combination with de novo loop generation.
Szwabowski GL; Castleman PN; Sears CK; Wink LH; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1027-1044. PubMed ID: 32737667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is It Reliable to Take the Molecular Docking Top Scoring Position as the Best Solution without Considering Available Structural Data?
Ramírez D; Caballero J
Molecules; 2018 Apr; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 29710787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved docking of peptides and small molecules in iMOLSDOCK.
Paul DS; Karthe P
J Mol Model; 2022 Dec; 29(1):12. PubMed ID: 36536252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using the multi-objective optimization replica exchange Monte Carlo enhanced sampling method for protein-small molecule docking.
Wang H; Liu H; Cai L; Wang C; Lv Q
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):327. PubMed ID: 28693470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.
Renner S; Derksen S; Radestock S; Mörchen F
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 18211051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
Cleves AE; Jain AN
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blind docking of pharmaceutically relevant compounds using RosettaLigand.
Davis IW; Raha K; Head MS; Baker D
Protein Sci; 2009 Sep; 18(9):1998-2002. PubMed ID: 19554568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine learning in computational docking.
Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. GPCR homology model template selection benchmarking: Global versus local similarity measures.
Castleman PN; Sears CK; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jan; 86():235-246. PubMed ID: 30390544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How to choose templates for modeling of protein complexes: Insights from benchmarking template-based docking.
Chakravarty D; McElfresh GW; Kundrotas PJ; Vakser IA
Proteins; 2020 Aug; 88(8):1070-1081. PubMed ID: 31994759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of multiple binding modes in ligand-protein docking.
Källblad P; Mancera RL; Todorov NP
J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(13):3334-7. PubMed ID: 15189030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Energy-based graph convolutional networks for scoring protein docking models.
Cao Y; Shen Y
Proteins; 2020 Aug; 88(8):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 32144844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys.
Hou Q; Lensink MF; Heringa J; Feenstra KA
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155251. PubMed ID: 27166787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
