These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23240574)

  • 1. Femoral prosthesis version angle calculation from a sagittal plane radiographic projection of the femur.
    Bausman JA; Wendelburg KL
    Vet Surg; 2013 May; 42(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 23240574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of acetabular cup positioning from a lateral radiographic projection after total hip replacement.
    Aman AM; Wendelburg KL
    Vet Surg; 2013 May; 42(4):406-17. PubMed ID: 23241097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship of the canine femoral head to the femoral neck: an anatomic study with relevance for hip arthroplasty implant design and implantation.
    Franklin SP; Franklin AL; Wilson H; Schultz L; Sonny Bal B; Cook JL
    Vet Surg; 2012 Jan; 41(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 22150546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Precision of a novel computed tomographic method for quantification of femoral varus in dogs and an assessment of the effect of femoral malpositioning.
    Oxley B; Gemmill TJ; Pink J; Clarke S; Parry A; Baines S; Malcolm McKee W
    Vet Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(6):751-8. PubMed ID: 23889776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of screw-in femoral implant in cementless total hip system.
    Kim JY; Hayashi K; Garcia TC; Kim SY; Entwistle R; Kapatkin AS; Stover SM
    Vet Surg; 2012 Jan; 41(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 22092256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of radiographic and anatomic femoral varus angle measurements in normal dogs.
    Swiderski JK; Radecki SV; Park RD; Palmer RH
    Vet Surg; 2008 Jan; 37(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18199056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated computation of femoral angles in dogs from three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions: Comparison with manual techniques.
    Longo F; Nicetto T; Banzato T; Savio G; Drigo M; Meneghello R; Concheri G; Isola M
    Vet J; 2018 Feb; 232():6-12. PubMed ID: 29428094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of sagittal plane positioning errors on measurement of the angle of inclination in dogs.
    Beck KA; Erb HN; Tapley K
    Vet Surg; 1992; 21(5):332-6. PubMed ID: 1413464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of cementless femoral stem level on mediolateral projection radiographs.
    Burneko M; Hudson CC; Beale BS
    Vet Surg; 2020 Aug; 49(6):1203-1212. PubMed ID: 32311116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a novel method to calculate cementless femoral stem level on craniocaudal projection radiographs.
    Brand KJ; Beale BS; Hudson CC
    Vet Surg; 2021 Nov; 50(8):1592-1599. PubMed ID: 34545581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of an automated three-dimensional technique for the computation of femoral angles in dogs.
    Longo F; Savio G; Contiero B; Meneghello R; Concheri G; Franchini F; Isola M
    Vet Rec; 2019 Oct; 185(14):443. PubMed ID: 31292274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of femoral angles in four dog breeds.
    Tomlinson J; Fox D; Cook JL; Keller GG
    Vet Surg; 2007 Aug; 36(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 17686134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographic determination of normal canine femoral alignment in the sagittal plane: A cadaveric pilot study.
    Peterson JL; Torres BT; Hutcheson KD; Fox DB
    Vet Surg; 2020 Aug; 49(6):1230-1238. PubMed ID: 32484579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fixation stability of femoral components in a canine hip replacement model.
    Vanderby R; Manley PA; Kohles SS; McBeath AA
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Mar; 10(2):300-9. PubMed ID: 1740746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of anatomical lateral distal femoral angles obtained with four femoral axis methods in canine femora.
    Miles JE; Mortensen M; Svalastoga EL; Eriksen T
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 25804405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
    Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
    Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variability associated with assessing changes in position of a canine uncemented femoral stem prosthesis.
    Korani HM; Marcellin-Little DJ; Roe SC
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 26449547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stability of proximal femoral grafts in canine hip arthroplasty.
    Heiner JP; Kohles SS; Manley PA; Vanderby R; Markel MD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Aug; (341):233-40. PubMed ID: 9269179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographic and computed tomographic determination of femoral varus and torsion in the dog.
    Dudley RM; Kowaleski MP; Drost WT; Dyce J
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2006; 47(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 17153063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computation of Femoral Canine Morphometric Parameters in Three-Dimensional Geometrical Models.
    Savio G; Baroni T; Concheri G; Baroni E; Meneghello R; Longo F; Isola M
    Vet Surg; 2016 Nov; 45(8):987-995. PubMed ID: 27716955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.