659 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23242011)
1. Three-year follow-up after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with first-generation or second-generation drug-eluting stents.
Almalla M; Schröder JW; Pross V; Marx N; Hoffmann R
Coron Artery Dis; 2013 Mar; 24(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 23242011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for treatment of bare metal stent restenosis.
Almalla M; Schröder JW; Pross V; Stegemann E; Marx N; Hoffmann R
Am J Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 108(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 21624553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-year outcomes after first- or second-generation drug-eluting or bare-metal stent implantation in all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pre-specified analysis from the PRODIGY study (PROlonging Dual Antiplatelet Treatment After Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia studY).
Valgimigli M; Tebaldi M; Borghesi M; Vranckx P; Campo G; Tumscitz C; Cangiano E; Minarelli M; Scalone A; Cavazza C; Marchesini J; Parrinello G;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 24332420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis.
Almalla M; Schröder J; Pross V; Marx N; Hoffmann R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 83(6):881-7. PubMed ID: 23765557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term outcome of the unrestricted use of everolimus-eluting stents compared to sirolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic patients: the Bern-Rotterdam diabetes cohort study.
Simsek C; Räber L; Magro M; Boersma E; Onuma Y; Stefanini GG; Zanchin T; Kalesan B; Wenaweser P; Jüni P; van Geuns RJ; van Domburg RT; Windecker S; Serruys PW
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 170(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 24196314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of six-year clinical outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents to bare-metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an analysis of the RESEARCH (rapamycin-eluting stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital) and T-SEARCH (taxus stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital) registries.
Simsek C; Magro M; Boersma E; Onuma Y; Nauta S; Daemen J; Gaspersz M; van Geuns RJ; van der Giessen W; van Domburg R; Serruys P
J Invasive Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 23(8):336-41. PubMed ID: 21828397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting stents for bare-metal in-stent restenosis.
Ota H; Mahmoudi M; Torguson R; Satler LF; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015; 16(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 25977226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of everolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of drug-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent restenosis.
Almalla M; Pross V; Marx N; Hoffmann R
Coron Artery Dis; 2012 Nov; 23(7):492-6. PubMed ID: 22990414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial.
Stone GW; Midei M; Newman W; Sanz M; Hermiller JB; Williams J; Farhat N; Caputo R; Xenopoulos N; Applegate R; Gordon P; White RM; Sudhir K; Cutlip DE; Petersen JL;
Circulation; 2009 Feb; 119(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 19171853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Everolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents for treatment of coronary in-stent restenoses.
Markovic S; Paliskyte R; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2012; 13(6):307-10. PubMed ID: 23164475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Six-year clinical outcomes of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a propensity-matched analysis.
Tarantini G; Barioli A; Facchin M; Frigo AC; Napodano M; Buja P; D'Amico G; Iliceto S; Isabella G
Coron Artery Dis; 2013 Aug; 24(5):440-8. PubMed ID: 23695366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short- and long-term outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal coronary stents: a mixed-treatment comparison analysis of 117 762 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials.
Bangalore S; Kumar S; Fusaro M; Amoroso N; Attubato MJ; Feit F; Bhatt DL; Slater J
Circulation; 2012 Jun; 125(23):2873-91. PubMed ID: 22586281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcomes with bioabsorbable polymer- versus durable polymer-based drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis.
Palmerini T; Biondi-Zoccai G; Della Riva D; Mariani A; Sabaté M; Smits PC; Kaiser C; D'Ascenzo F; Frati G; Mancone M; Genereux P; Stone GW
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 63(4):299-307. PubMed ID: 24211507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and efficacy outcomes of overlapping second-generation everolimus-eluting stents versus first-generation drug-eluting stents.
Kitabata H; Loh JP; Pendyala LK; Badr S; Dvir D; Barbash IM; Minha S; Torguson R; Chen F; Satler LF; Suddath WO; Kent KM; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Am J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 112(8):1093-8. PubMed ID: 23827397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Everolimus-eluting stents versus sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year results from the Guthrie Health Off-Label Stent (GHOST) registry.
Harjai KJ; Kondareddy S; Pinkosky B; Harjai N; Orshaw P; Boura J
J Interv Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 26(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 23363439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term safety and efficacy of second-generation everolimus-eluting stents compared to other limus-eluting stents and bare metal stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Omar A; Torguson R; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Loh JP; Magalhaes MA; Satler LF; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 84(7):1053-60. PubMed ID: 24619969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Four-year clinical outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents compared to bare-metal stents for the percutaneous treatment of stable coronary artery disease.
Simsek C; Onuma Y; Magro M; de Boer S; Battes L; van Domburg RT; Boersma E; Serruys PW;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jul; 76(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 20310019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of three-year clinical outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH Registries).
Daemen J; Tanimoto S; García-García HM; Kukreja N; van de Sande M; Sianos G; de Jaegere PP; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW
Am J Cardiol; 2007 Apr; 99(8):1027-32. PubMed ID: 17437722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The everolimus-eluting stent in real-world patients: 6-month follow-up of the X-SEARCH (Xience V Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiac Hospital) registry.
Onuma Y; Kukreja N; Piazza N; Eindhoven J; Girasis C; Schenkeveld L; van Domburg R; Serruys PW;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Jul; 54(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 19589442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Second-generation everolimus-eluting stents versus first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction. 1-year results of the randomized XAMI (XienceV Stent vs. Cypher Stent in Primary PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial.
Hofma SH; Brouwer J; Velders MA; van't Hof AW; Smits PC; Queré M; de Vries CJ; van Boven AJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Jul; 60(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 22835668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
