260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23242132)
21. Enhanced streamflow prediction with SWAT using support vector regression for spatial calibration: A case study in the Illinois River watershed, U.S.
Yuan L; Forshay KJ
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0248489. PubMed ID: 33844687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An auto-adaptive optimization approach for targeting nonpoint source pollution control practices.
Chen L; Wei G; Shen Z
Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15393. PubMed ID: 26487474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Nonpoint source pollution responses simulation for conversion cropland to forest in mountains by SWAT in China.
Ouyang W; Hao FH; Wang XL; Cheng HG
Environ Manage; 2008 Jan; 41(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 17938997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A topography analysis incorporated optimization method for the selection and placement of best management practices.
Shen Z; Chen L; Xu L
PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54520. PubMed ID: 23349917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparing two tools for ecosystem service assessments regarding water resources decisions.
Dennedy-Frank PJ; Muenich RL; Chaubey I; Ziv G
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jul; 177():331-40. PubMed ID: 27111651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Integrated assessment modeling reveals near-channel management as cost-effective to improve water quality in agricultural watersheds.
Hansen AT; Campbell T; Cho SJ; Czuba JA; Dalzell BJ; Dolph CL; Hawthorne PL; Rabotyagov S; Lang Z; Kumarasamy K; Belmont P; Finlay JC; Foufoula-Georgiou E; Gran KB; Kling CL; Wilcock P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jul; 118(28):. PubMed ID: 34260382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The challenge of documenting water quality benefits of conservation practices: a review of USDA-ARS's conservation effects assessment project watershed studies.
Tomer MD; Locke MA
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(1):300-10. PubMed ID: 22053489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Using Spatially Targeted Conservation to Evaluate Nitrogen Reduction and Economic Opportunities for Best Management Practice Placement in Agricultural Landscapes.
Zimmerman EK; Tyndall JC; Schulte LA
Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 64(3):313-328. PubMed ID: 31367774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms applied to watershed management problem.
Wang S; Wang Y; Wang Y; Wang Z
J Environ Manage; 2022 Dec; 324():116255. PubMed ID: 36352707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of land cover and land use change on runoff characteristics.
Sajikumar N; Remya RS
J Environ Manage; 2015 Sep; 161():460-468. PubMed ID: 25575849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A systematic assessment of watershed-scale nonpoint source pollution during rainfall-runoff events in the Miyun Reservoir watershed.
Qiu J; Shen Z; Wei G; Wang G; Xie H; Lv G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Mar; 25(7):6514-6531. PubMed ID: 29255977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A VSA-based strategy for placing conservation buffers in agricultural watersheds.
Qiu Z
Environ Manage; 2003 Sep; 32(3):299-311. PubMed ID: 14753616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A robust simulation-optimization modeling system for effluent trading--a case study of nonpoint source pollution control.
Zhang JL; Li YP; Huang GH
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2014 Apr; 21(7):5036-53. PubMed ID: 24366827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluating agricultural best management practices in tile-drained subwatersheds of the Mackinaw River, Illinois.
Lemke AM; Kirkham KG; Lindenbaum TT; Herbert ME; Tear TH; Perry WL; Herkert JR
J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(4):1215-28. PubMed ID: 21712591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Meeting Water Quality Goals by Spatial Targeting of Best Management Practices under Climate Change.
Xu Y; Bosch DJ; Wagena MB; Collick AS; Easton ZM
Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 63(2):173-184. PubMed ID: 30635682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing the cumulative impacts of geographically isolated wetlands on watershed hydrology using the SWAT model coupled with improved wetland modules.
Lee S; Yeo IY; Lang MW; Sadeghi AM; McCarty GW; Moglen GE; Evenson GR
J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():37-48. PubMed ID: 29886149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of two spatial optimization techniques: a framework to solve multiobjective land use distribution problems.
Meyer BC; Lescot JM; Laplana R
Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 43(2):264-81. PubMed ID: 19015827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. BMP analysis system for watershed-based stormwater management.
Zhen J; Shoemaker L; Riverson J; Alvi K; Cheng MS
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2006; 41(7):1391-403. PubMed ID: 16854811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prioritizing conservation practice locations for effective water quality improvement using the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF) and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT).
Rohith AN; Karki R; Veith TL; Preisendanz HE; Duncan JM; Kleinman PJA; Cibin R
J Environ Manage; 2024 Jan; 349():119514. PubMed ID: 37976641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Agricultural practices influence flow regimes of headwater streams in western Iowa.
Tomer MD; Meek DW; Kramer LA
J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(5):1547-58. PubMed ID: 16091607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
