149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23242218)
1. New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the structured interview of reported symptoms.
Green D; Rosenfeld B; Belfi B
Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 23242218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The detection of feigning using multiple PAI scale elevations: a new index.
Gaines MV; Giles CL; Morgan RD
Assessment; 2013 Aug; 20(4):437-47. PubMed ID: 22946102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An investigation of the ECST-R in male pretrial patients: evaluating the effects of feigning on competency evaluations.
Vitacco MJ; Rogers R; Gabel J
Assessment; 2009 Sep; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 19779096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The utility of the structured interview of reported symptoms in a sample of individuals with intellectual disabilities.
Weiss RA; Rosenfeld B; Farkas MR
Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 21561992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-validation of the PAI Negative Distortion Scale for feigned mental disorders: a research report.
Rogers R; Gillard ND; Wooley CN; Kelsey KR
Assessment; 2013 Feb; 20(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22855508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) validity scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: a known-groups design.
Sellbom M; Toomey JA; Wygant DB; Kucharski LT; Duncan S
Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 20230148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The validity of the M test in a residential forensic facility.
Hankins GC; Barnard GW; Robbins L
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 8477102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Forensic applications of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST): screening for feigned disorders in competency to stand trial evaluations.
Jackson RL; Rogers R; Sewell KW
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Apr; 29(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 15912724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decreased risk for violence in patients admitted to forensic care, measured with the HCR-20.
Olsson H; Strand S; Kristiansen L; Sjöling M; Asplund K
Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2013 Aug; 27(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 23915697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Malingering in a correctional setting: the use of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms in a jail sample.
McDermott BE; Sokolov G
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):753-65. PubMed ID: 19743514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the gold standard: a review and meta-analysis of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms.
Green D; Rosenfeld B
Psychol Assess; 2011 Mar; 23(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 21381842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rates of computational errors for scoring the SIRS primary scales.
Tyner EA; Frederick RI
Psychol Assess; 2013 Dec; 25(4):1367-9. PubMed ID: 23855329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of malingering with repeat forensic evaluations: patient variability and possible misclassification on the SIRS and other feigning measures.
Rogers R; Vitacco MJ; Kurus SJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 20305084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the SIRS in compensation cases: an examination of its validity and generalizability.
Rogers R; Payne JW; Berry DT; Granacher RP
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 18679780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI-2 and the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology.
Lewis JL; Simcox AM; Berry DT
Psychol Assess; 2002 Jun; 14(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 12056079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of malingering screens with competency to stand trial patients: a known-groups comparison.
Vitacco MJ; Rogers R; Gabel J; Munizza J
Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 17058121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of an abbreviated version of the structured interview of reported symptoms in outpatient psychiatric and community settings.
Green D; Rosenfeld B; Dole T; Pivovarova E; Zapf PA
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Apr; 32(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17558482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and initial validation of a scale for detecting inconsistent responding on the personality assessment inventory-short form.
Siefert CJ; Stein M; Sinclair SJ; Antonius D; Shiva A; Blais MA
J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(6):601-6. PubMed ID: 22574923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Spanish SIRS with monolingual Hispanic outpatients.
Correa AA; Rogers R; Hoersting R
J Pers Assess; 2010 Sep; 92(5):458-64. PubMed ID: 20706932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Likelihood of obtaining Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 elevations among forensic psychiatric inpatients with screening elevations on the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test.
Glassmire DM; Tarescavage AM; Gottfried ED
Psychol Assess; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1586-1596. PubMed ID: 27046275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
