These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2324260)
1. Automated semen analysis shows an increase in sperm concentration and motility with time in Makler chambers having excess sample volume. Yanagida K; Hoshi K; Sato A; Burkman L Hum Reprod; 1990 Feb; 5(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 2324260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis. Hoogewijs MK; de Vliegher SP; Govaere JL; de Schauwer C; de Kruif A; van Soom A Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of bovine seminal quality assessments using different viewing chambers with a computer-assisted semen analyzer. Lenz RW; Kjelland ME; Vonderhaar K; Swannack TM; Moreno JF J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 20952528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of Makler counting chamber and improved Neubauer hemocytometer in sperm concentration measurement. Sukcharoen N; Ngeamjirawat J; Chanprasit Y; Aribarg A J Med Assoc Thai; 1994 Sep; 77(9):471-6. PubMed ID: 7706966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Use of Makler counting chamber in semen analysis]. Tomoyoshi T; Ishida A; Kim CJ Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Nov; 34(11):1931-3. PubMed ID: 3242367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of chamber characteristics, loading and analysis time on motility and kinetic variables analysed with the CASA-mot system in goat sperm. Del Gallego R; Sadeghi S; Blasco E; Soler C; Yániz JL; Silvestre MA Anim Reprod Sci; 2017 Feb; 177():97-104. PubMed ID: 28063626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Quality evaluation of 3 sperm counting chambers by computer-assisted sperm analysis system]. Cai J; Zeng Y; Song C; Mo ML; Yin B; Lin Q; Huang J Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 15(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19452697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of chamber type integrated with computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) system on the results of boar semen evaluation. Gączarzewicz D Pol J Vet Sci; 2015; 18(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 26812825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrepancies in the determination of sperm concentration using Bürker-Türk, Thoma and Makler counting chambers. Christensen P; Stryhn H; Hansen C Theriogenology; 2005 Mar; 63(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 15710187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Quality evaluation of three different sperm counting chambers]. Lu J; Lü N; Huang Y; Li PS; Fisch H Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2004 Oct; 10(10):755-7, 760. PubMed ID: 15562789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of four methods for sperm counting]. Hu YA; Lu JC; Lu NQ; Shao Y; Huang YF Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Mar; 12(3):222-4, 227. PubMed ID: 16597036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of chamber characteristics on the reliability of sperm concentration and movement measurements obtained by manual and videomicrographic analysis. Ginsburg KA; Armant DR Fertil Steril; 1990 May; 53(5):882-7. PubMed ID: 2332061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of different counting chambers using a computer-assisted semen analyzer. Peng N; Zou X; Li L Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2015; 61(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 26214093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Advances in standardization and quality control for the analysis of sperm quality parameters]. Huang YF; Lu JC Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2007 Nov; 13(11):963-8. PubMed ID: 18077904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement and internal quality assurance of the Neubauer hemocytometer and Makler chamber for human sperm concentration determination. Costa AF; Onofre FBM; Onofre ASC JBRA Assist Reprod; 2024 Jun; 28(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 38530757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4-7 days of ejaculation abstinence. Alipour H; Van Der Horst G; Christiansen OB; Dardmeh F; Jørgensen N; Nielsen HI; Hnida C Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1364-1372. PubMed ID: 28531319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of two computer-automated semen analysis instruments for the evaluation of sperm motion characteristics in the stallion. Jasko DJ; Lein DH; Foote RH J Androl; 1990; 11(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 2254179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]