These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2324260)

  • 21. Micromachined analytical devices: microchips for semen testing.
    Kricka LJ; Faro I; Heyner S; Garside WT; Fitzpatrick G; McKinnon G; Ho J; Wilding P
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 1997 Jun; 15(9-10):1443-7. PubMed ID: 9226574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Discrepancies in sperm count using improved Neubauer, Makler, and Horwells counting chambers.
    Imade GE; Towobola OA; Sagay AS; Otubu JA
    Arch Androl; 1993; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8373281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automation of semen analysis using flow cytometer in comparison with manual methods.
    Saleh M; Fathy A; El-Akras AI; Eyada MM; Younes S; El-Gohary AM
    Egypt J Immunol; 2005; 12(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 16734137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of semen analysis between the two Hamilton-Thorn semen analysers.
    Agarwal A; Ozturk E; Loughlin KR
    Andrologia; 1992; 24(6):327-9. PubMed ID: 1443674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Delay in the application of the cover glass is a potential source of error with the Makler Counting Chamber.
    Matson P; Irving J; Zuvela E; Hughes R
    Fertil Steril; 1999 Sep; 72(3):559-61. PubMed ID: 10519637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of the chamber on kinetic results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa.
    Gloria A; Carluccio A; Contri A; Wegher L; Valorz C; Robbe D
    Andrology; 2013 Nov; 1(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 23996954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of semen preparation on casa motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa.
    Contri A; Valorz C; Faustini M; Wegher L; Carluccio A
    Theriogenology; 2010 Aug; 74(3):424-35. PubMed ID: 20451996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Influence of the depth of the sperm counting chamber on sperm motility].
    Lu JC; Yue RQ; Feng RX; Kong LZ; Xu YC
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Sep; 19(9):776-9. PubMed ID: 24386852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative study of two computerized semen motility analyzers.
    Gill HS; Van Arsdalen K; Hypolite J; Levin RM; Ruzich JV
    Andrologia; 1988; 20(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 3207202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part I. Comparison of counting chambers.
    Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 8557132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The comparison of assessment of pigeon semen motility and sperm concentration by conventional methods and the CASA system (HTM IVOS).
    Klimowicz MD; Nizanski W; Batkowski F; Savic MA
    Theriogenology; 2008 Jul; 70(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18423566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sperm quality assessment via separation and sedimentation in a microfluidic device.
    Chen CY; Chiang TC; Lin CM; Lin SS; Jong DS; Tsai VF; Hsieh JT; Wo AM
    Analyst; 2013 Sep; 138(17):4967-74. PubMed ID: 23817531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computerized semen analysis (CASA): effect of semen concentration and chamber depth on measurements.
    Spiropoulos J
    Arch Androl; 2001; 46(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 11204615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quality assurance for sperm concentration using latex beads.
    Peters AJ; Zaneveld LJ; Jeyendran RS
    Fertil Steril; 1993 Oct; 60(4):702-5. PubMed ID: 8405529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of a new disposable counting chamber.
    Coetzee K; Menkveld R
    Arch Androl; 2001; 47(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 11554687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Semen quality and age-specific changes: a study between two decades on 3,729 male partners of couples with normal sperm count and attending an andrology laboratory for infertility-related problems in an Indian city.
    Mukhopadhyay D; Varghese AC; Pal M; Banerjee SK; Bhattacharyya AK; Sharma RK; Agarwal A
    Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2247-54. PubMed ID: 19328484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of four chambers to measure sperm concentration: results from an external quality assurance programme.
    Zuvela E; Matson P
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Oct; 41(4):671-678. PubMed ID: 32843307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relationship between antisperm antibodies, sperm movement, and semen quality.
    Munuce MJ; Berta CL; Pauluzzi F; Caille AM
    Urol Int; 2000; 65(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 11112869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Particle distribution in low-volume capillary-loaded chambers.
    Douglas-Hamilton DH; Smith NG; Kuster CE; Vermeiden JP; Althouse GC
    J Androl; 2005; 26(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 15611574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of a sperm quality analyser on semen of turkey breeders to monitor storage time effects and age-related changes during a reproductive cycle.
    Neuman SL; McDaniel CD; Frank L; Radu J; Hester PY
    Br Poult Sci; 2002 Jul; 43(3):465-71. PubMed ID: 12195807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.