166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23242770)
1. Metacognition of the testing effect: guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval.
Tullis JG; Finley JR; Benjamin AS
Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):429-42. PubMed ID: 23242770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The efficacy of learners' testing choices.
Tullis JG; Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):540-552. PubMed ID: 29094989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieval practice sensitive to lag and criterion level effects?
Pyc MA; Rawson KA
Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):976-88. PubMed ID: 22399224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning.
Undorf M; Söllner A; Bröder A
Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):507-519. PubMed ID: 29327336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments.
Frank DJ; Kuhlmann BG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 27709983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices.
Toppino TC; Pagano MJ
Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):467-479. PubMed ID: 33006078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confidence ratings are better predictors of future performance than delayed judgments of learning.
Putnam AL; Deng W; DeSoto KA
Memory; 2022 May; 30(5):537-553. PubMed ID: 35037570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. People use the memory for past-test heuristic as an explicit cue for judgments of learning.
Serra MJ; Ariel R
Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1260-72. PubMed ID: 24898119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On belief and fluency in the construction of judgments of learning: Assessing and altering the direct effects of belief.
Blake AB; Castel AD
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():27-38. PubMed ID: 29689481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How Much Do Metamemory Beliefs Contribute to the Font-Size Effect in Judgments of Learning?
Hu X; Li T; Zheng J; Su N; Liu Z; Luo L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142351. PubMed ID: 26556478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The neurocognitive basis of metamemory: Using the N400 to study the contribution of fluency to judgments of learning.
Undorf M; Amaefule CO; Kamp SM
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Mar; 169():107176. PubMed ID: 32001337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From JOLs to JOLs+: Directing learners' attention in retrieval practice to boost integrative argumentation.
Wong SSH; Lim SWH
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):543-557. PubMed ID: 31021111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The concreteness effect on judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of fluency and beliefs.
Witherby AE; Tauber SK
Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):639-650. PubMed ID: 27987115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning.
Zimdahl MF; Undorf M
Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):559-572. PubMed ID: 33896394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.
Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):922-38. PubMed ID: 25777138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate judgments of learning are insensitive to implicit interference effects at retrieval.
Eakin DK; Hertzog C
Mem Cognit; 2012 Jan; 40(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 21915761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
Koriat A; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16938051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
