These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23242770)
1. Metacognition of the testing effect: guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval. Tullis JG; Finley JR; Benjamin AS Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):429-42. PubMed ID: 23242770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate? Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The efficacy of learners' testing choices. Tullis JG; Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):540-552. PubMed ID: 29094989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study. Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieval practice sensitive to lag and criterion level effects? Pyc MA; Rawson KA Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):976-88. PubMed ID: 22399224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning. Undorf M; Söllner A; Bröder A Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):507-519. PubMed ID: 29327336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments. Frank DJ; Kuhlmann BG J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 27709983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices. Toppino TC; Pagano MJ Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):467-479. PubMed ID: 33006078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confidence ratings are better predictors of future performance than delayed judgments of learning. Putnam AL; Deng W; DeSoto KA Memory; 2022 May; 30(5):537-553. PubMed ID: 35037570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. People use the memory for past-test heuristic as an explicit cue for judgments of learning. Serra MJ; Ariel R Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1260-72. PubMed ID: 24898119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On belief and fluency in the construction of judgments of learning: Assessing and altering the direct effects of belief. Blake AB; Castel AD Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():27-38. PubMed ID: 29689481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How Much Do Metamemory Beliefs Contribute to the Font-Size Effect in Judgments of Learning? Hu X; Li T; Zheng J; Su N; Liu Z; Luo L PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142351. PubMed ID: 26556478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The neurocognitive basis of metamemory: Using the N400 to study the contribution of fluency to judgments of learning. Undorf M; Amaefule CO; Kamp SM Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Mar; 169():107176. PubMed ID: 32001337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From JOLs to JOLs+: Directing learners' attention in retrieval practice to boost integrative argumentation. Wong SSH; Lim SWH J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):543-557. PubMed ID: 31021111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory. England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The concreteness effect on judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of fluency and beliefs. Witherby AE; Tauber SK Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):639-650. PubMed ID: 27987115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning. Zimdahl MF; Undorf M Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):559-572. PubMed ID: 33896394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval. Tullis JG; Benjamin AS Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):922-38. PubMed ID: 25777138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate judgments of learning are insensitive to implicit interference effects at retrieval. Eakin DK; Hertzog C Mem Cognit; 2012 Jan; 40(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 21915761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures. Koriat A; Bjork RA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16938051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]