These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23242799)

  • 1. Is better beautiful or is beautiful better? Exploring the relationship between beauty and category structure.
    Sanders M; Davis T; Love BC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):566-73. PubMed ID: 23242799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can persons with schizophrenia appreciate visual art?
    Chen Y; Norton D; McBain R
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Oct; 105(1-3):245-51. PubMed ID: 18708280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural correlates of beauty.
    Kawabata H; Zeki S
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 91(4):1699-705. PubMed ID: 15010496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inducing preference reversals in aesthetic choices for paintings: Introducing the contrast paradigm.
    Belchev Z; Bodner GE; Fawcett JM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196246. PubMed ID: 29672641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abstract art paintings, global image properties, and verbal descriptions: An empirical and computational investigation.
    Hayn-Leichsenring GU; Kenett YN; Schulz K; Chatterjee A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jan; 202():102936. PubMed ID: 31743852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Influence of Art Expertise and Training on Emotion and Preference Ratings for Representational and Abstract Artworks.
    van Paasschen J; Bacci F; Melcher DP
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134241. PubMed ID: 26244368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The differential power of extraneous influences to modify aesthetic judgments of biological and artifactual stimuli.
    Bignardi G; Ishizu T; Zeki S
    Psych J; 2021 Apr; 10(2):190-199. PubMed ID: 33295099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring aesthetic emotions: A review of the literature and a new assessment tool.
    Schindler I; Hosoya G; Menninghaus W; Beermann U; Wagner V; Eid M; Scherer KR
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178899. PubMed ID: 28582467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Art expertise in construing meaning of representational and abstract artworks.
    Bimler DL; Snellock M; Paramei GV
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():11-22. PubMed ID: 30390421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inside the Michelangelo effect: The role of art and aesthetic attractiveness on perceived fatigue and hand kinematics in virtual painting.
    Iosa M; Bini F; Marinozzi F; Antonucci G; Pascucci S; Baghini G; Guarino V; Paolucci S; Morone G; Tieri G
    Psych J; 2022 Oct; 11(5):748-754. PubMed ID: 36168965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beauty in abstract paintings: perceptual contrast and statistical properties.
    Mallon B; Redies C; Hayn-Leichsenring GU
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():161. PubMed ID: 24711791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of beauty and liking ratings for abstract and representational paintings using subjective and objective measures.
    Sidhu DM; McDougall KH; Jalava ST; Bodner GE
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200431. PubMed ID: 29979779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intuitions about mathematical beauty: A case study in the aesthetic experience of ideas.
    Johnson SGB; Steinerberger S
    Cognition; 2019 Aug; 189():242-259. PubMed ID: 31015078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effort after meaning and the hedonic value of paintings.
    Russell PA
    Br J Psychol; 2003 Feb; 94(Pt 1):99-110. PubMed ID: 12648392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contextual and social variables modulate aesthetic appreciation of bodily and abstract art stimuli.
    Era V; Candidi M; Aglioti SM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Aug; 199():102881. PubMed ID: 31352258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological brain dynamics during the esthetic judgment of human bodies and faces.
    Muñoz F; Martín-Loeches M
    Brain Res; 2015 Jan; 1594():154-64. PubMed ID: 25451119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pigeons can discriminate "good" and "bad" paintings by children.
    Watanabe S
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Jan; 13(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 19533184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An empirical evaluation of the visual rightness theory of pictorial composition.
    Locher PJ; Stappers PJ; Overbeeke K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Dec; 103(3):261-80. PubMed ID: 10668300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sparsity in an artificial neural network predicts beauty: Towards a model of processing-based aesthetics.
    Dibot NM; Tieo S; Mendelson TC; Puech W; Renoult JP
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Dec; 19(12):e1011703. PubMed ID: 38048323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The world can look better: enhancing beauty experience with brain stimulation.
    Cattaneo Z; Lega C; Flexas A; Nadal M; Munar E; Cela-Conde CJ
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Nov; 9(11):1713-21. PubMed ID: 24132459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.