181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23242816)
21. Comparison of proximal caries detection in primary teeth between laser fluorescence and bitewing radiography.
Virajsilp V; Thearmontree A; Aryatawong S; Paiboonwarachat D
Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 16532891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnodent and VistaCam may be unsuitable for the evaluation of dental caries in archeological teeth.
Dąbrowski P; Grzelak J; Kulus M; Staniowski T
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Apr; 168(4):797-808. PubMed ID: 30693947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vitro detection of secondary caries associated with composite restorations on approximal surfaces using laser fluorescence.
Rodrigues JA; Neuhaus KW; Hug I; Stich H; Seemann R; Lussi A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 20945748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative in vitro validation of VistaProof and DIAGNOdent pen for occlusal caries detection in permanent teeth.
Seremidi K; Lagouvardos P; Kavvadia K
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):234-45. PubMed ID: 22166109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25.
Sürme K; Kara NB; Yilmaz Y
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2020 Feb; 38(2):105-111. PubMed ID: 31589586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Intraoral Radiography in Detection of Recurrent Caries under Composite Restorations.
Kasraei S; Shokri A; Poorolajal J; Khajeh S; Rahmani H
Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 28301024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting secondary caries under composite fillings: an in vitro study.
Yildizer Keris E; Demirel O; Ozdede M; Altunkaynak B; Peker I
J Istanb Univ Fac Dent; 2017; 51(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 28955582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic validity of the use of ICDAS II and DIAGNOdent pen verified by micro-computed tomography for the detection of occlusal caries lesions-an in vitro evaluation.
Luczaj-Cepowicz E; Marczuk-Kolada G; Obidzinska M; Sidun J
Lasers Med Sci; 2019 Oct; 34(8):1655-1663. PubMed ID: 31201666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Occlusal caries detection and quantification by DIAGNOdent and Electronic Caries Monitor: in vitro comparison.
Bamzahim M; Shi XQ; Angmar-Månsson B
Acta Odontol Scand; 2002 Dec; 60(6):360-4. PubMed ID: 12512886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods.
Attrill DC; Ashley PF
Br Dent J; 2001 Apr; 190(8):440-3. PubMed ID: 11352392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical performance of a new laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars.
Huth KC; Neuhaus KW; Gygax M; Bücher K; Crispin A; Paschos E; Hickel R; Lussi A
J Dent; 2008 Dec; 36(12):1033-40. PubMed ID: 18930575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro comparison of laser fluorescence performance with visual examination for detection of occlusal caries in permanent and primary molars.
Rodrigues JA; Diniz MB; Josgrilberg EB; Cordeiro RC
Lasers Med Sci; 2009 Jul; 24(4):501-6. PubMed ID: 18373155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An in vitro comparison of detection methods for approximal carious lesions in primary molars.
Chawla N; Messer LB; Adams GG; Manton DJ
Caries Res; 2012; 46(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 22508449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A novel LED-based device for occlusal caries detection.
Aktan AM; Cebe MA; Ciftçi ME; Sirin Karaarslan E
Lasers Med Sci; 2012 Nov; 27(6):1157-63. PubMed ID: 22080431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Effect of Combining Radiographs and DIAGNOdent With Visual Examination on Detection and Treatment Decisions of Noncavitated Occluso-dentinal Caries.
Alomari QD; Qudeimat MA; Khalaf ME; Al-Tarakemah Y
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 25535787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of validity of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard: an in vivo study.
Goel A; Chawla HS; Gauba K; Goyal A
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009; 27(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 19915274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of the calibration method of a laser fluorescence device for detecting occlusal caries in primary molars.
Braga MM; Mendes FM; Martins CR; Imparato JC
Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(5):451-4. PubMed ID: 17036712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical study of the use of the laser fluorescence device DIAGNOdent for detection of occlusal caries in children.
Anttonen V; Seppä L; Hausen H
Caries Res; 2003; 37(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 12566634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. DIAGNOdent versus International Caries Detection and Assessment System in detection of incipient carious lesions: A diagnostic accuracy study.
Shaalan OO
J Conserv Dent; 2023; 26(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 37205891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparative evaluation of DIAGNOdent and caries detector dye in detection of residual caries in prepared cavities.
Akbari M; Ahrari F; Jafari M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):515-20. PubMed ID: 23151702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
