These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23244047)

  • 1. Beauty beyond compare: effects of context extremity and categorization on hedonic contrast.
    Cogan E; Parker S; Zellner DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 23244047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attractiveness difference magnitude affected by context, range, and categorization.
    Forsythe M; Zellner D; Cogan E; Parker S
    Perception; 2014; 43(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 24689132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
    Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological correlates of processing facial attractiveness and its influence on cooperative behavior.
    Chen J; Zhong J; Zhang Y; Li P; Zhang A; Tan Q; Li H
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 May; 517(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 22410307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial attractiveness biases the perception of eye contact.
    Kloth N; Altmann CS; Schweinberger SR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1906-18. PubMed ID: 21756185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying cognitive preferences for attractive female faces: an event-related potential experiment using a study-test paradigm.
    Zhang Y; Kong F; Chen H; Jackson T; Han L; Meng J; Yang Z; Gao J; Najam ul Hasan A
    J Neurosci Res; 2011 Nov; 89(11):1887-93. PubMed ID: 21805493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Unger L; Little AC; Feinberg DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1420-30. PubMed ID: 18085954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Different processes in attractiveness assessments for unattractive and highly attractive faces-The role of presentation duration and rotation.
    Stróżak P; Zielińska M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102946. PubMed ID: 31693937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How facial attractiveness affects sustained attention.
    Li J; Oksama L; Hyönä J
    Scand J Psychol; 2016 Oct; 57(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 27347672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beauty is better pursued: effects of attractiveness in multiple-face tracking.
    Liu CH; Chen W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):553-64. PubMed ID: 22117090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of position and context on facial attractiveness.
    Rodway P; Schepman A; Lambert J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):522-9. PubMed ID: 24140819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Different influences of facial attractiveness on judgments of moral beauty and moral goodness.
    Cui X; Cheng Q; Lin W; Lin J; Mo L
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):12152. PubMed ID: 31434984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Something to smile about: the interrelationship between attractiveness and emotional expression.
    Golle J; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(2):298-310. PubMed ID: 23875865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attractiveness as a Function of Skin Tone and Facial Features: Evidence from Categorization Studies.
    Stepanova EV; Strube MJ
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 29182445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adult age and gender differences in perceptions of facial attractiveness: beauty is in the eye of the older beholder.
    Foos PW; Clark MC
    J Genet Psychol; 2011; 172(2):162-75. PubMed ID: 21675545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The two sides of beauty: laterality and the duality of facial attractiveness.
    Franklin RG; Adams RB
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Mar; 72(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 19914760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attractiveness of natural faces compared to computer constructed perfectly symmetrical faces.
    Zaidel DW; Deblieck C
    Int J Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 117(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 17365126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Covert detection of attractiveness among the neurologically intact: evidence from skin-conductance responses.
    McDonald PR; Slater AM; Longmore CA
    Perception; 2008; 37(7):1054-60. PubMed ID: 18773728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protection for the good: subcategorization reduces hedonic contrast.
    Zellner DA; Kern BB; Parker S
    Appetite; 2002 Jun; 38(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 12071682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.