219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23244053)
21. Pictorial encoding effects and memory confusions in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm: evidence for the activation of spontaneous imagery.
Foley MA; Foy J
Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):712-27. PubMed ID: 18720219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. "A long time ago, in a context far, far away": retrospective time estimates and internal context change.
Sahakyan L; Smith JR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 23957367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
Illman NA; Morrison CM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Retrieval-induced forgetting: testing the competition assumption of inhibition theory.
Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Sep; 66(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 22506876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A computational model of prefrontal control in free recall: strategic memory use in the California Verbal Learning Task.
Becker S; Lim J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):821-32. PubMed ID: 14511535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The longevity of adaptive memory: evidence for mnemonic advantages of survival processing 24 and 48 hours later.
Raymaekers LH; Otgaar H; Smeets T
Memory; 2014; 22(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 23638617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Associative spread as a mediating variable in the generation effect.
Widner RL
Memory; 1995 Mar; 3(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 8556532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks.
Loaiza VM; McCabe DP; Youngblood JL; Rose NS; Myerson J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1258-63. PubMed ID: 21707214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Adaptive memory: thinking about function.
Bell R; Röer JP; Buchner A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1038-48. PubMed ID: 25419817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fit to last: Exploring the longevity of the survival processing effect.
Clark DP; Bruno D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(6):1164-78. PubMed ID: 26223150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How can I use it? The role of functional fixedness in the survival-processing paradigm.
Kroneisen M; Kriechbaumer M; Kamp SM; Erdfelder E
Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):324-332. PubMed ID: 32935282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The role of perceived threat in the survival processing memory advantage.
Olds JM; Lanska M; Westerman DL
Memory; 2014; 22(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 23786410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Encoding richness of self-generated elaboration and spacing effects on incidental memory.
Toyota H; Kikuchi Y
Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Oct; 101(2):621-7. PubMed ID: 16383100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
Blumen HM; Rajaram S
Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Age differences in cued recall and recognition under varying encoding and retrieval conditions.
West RL; Boatwright LK
Exp Aging Res; 1983; 9(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 6641780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cognitive load hypothesis of item-method directed forgetting.
Lee YS
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1110-22. PubMed ID: 22372566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Implicit and explicit memory processes in panic patients as reflected in behavioral and electrophysiological measures.
Pauli P; Dengler W; Wiedemann G
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2005 Jun; 36(2):111-27. PubMed ID: 15814080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Source-constrained recall: front-end and back-end control of retrieval quality.
Halamish V; Goldsmith M; Jacoby LL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 21859234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dying scenarios improve recall as much as survival scenarios.
Burns DJ; Hart J; Kramer ME
Memory; 2014; 22(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 23678953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Individual differences in self-initiated processing at encoding and retrieval: a latent variable analysis.
Unsworth N
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 18780192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
