332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23244808)
1. Comparison of generic, condition-specific, and mapped health state utility values for multiple myeloma cancer.
Rowen D; Young T; Brazier J; Gaugris S
Value Health; 2012 Dec; 15(8):1059-68. PubMed ID: 23244808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 to EQ-5D in patients with multiple myeloma.
Proskorovsky I; Lewis P; Williams CD; Jordan K; Kyriakou C; Ishak J; Davies FE
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Mar; 12():35. PubMed ID: 24618388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Condition-specific or generic preference-based measures in oncology? A comparison of the EORTC-8D and the EQ-5D-3L.
Lorgelly PK; Doble B; Rowen D; Brazier J;
Qual Life Res; 2017 May; 26(5):1163-1176. PubMed ID: 27830513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of health state utility values associated with oral potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer in Sri Lanka assessed using the EQ-5D-3 L and the EORTC-8D.
Kularatna S; Whitty JA; Johnson NW; Jayasinghe R; Scuffham PA
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Jul; 14():101. PubMed ID: 27402015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health-Related Quality of Life and Health Utilities in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Survey Capturing Experiences from a Diverse Sample of UK Patients.
Lloyd AJ; Kerr C; Penton J; Knerer G
Value Health; 2015 Dec; 18(8):1152-7. PubMed ID: 26686802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Which Questionnaire Should Be Used to Measure Quality-of-Life Utilities in Patients with Acute Leukemia? An Evaluation of the Validity and Interpretability of the EQ-5D-5L and Preference-Based Questionnaires Derived from the EORTC QLQ-C30.
van Dongen-Leunis A; Redekop WK; Uyl-de Groot CA
Value Health; 2016; 19(6):834-843. PubMed ID: 27712712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study protocol for valuing EQ-5D-3L and EORTC-8D health states in a representative population sample in Sri Lanka.
Kularatna S; Whitty JA; Johnson NW; Scuffham PA
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2013 Sep; 11():149. PubMed ID: 24070162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-3L: assessing the external validity of existing mapping algorithms.
Doble B; Lorgelly P
Qual Life Res; 2016 Apr; 25(4):891-911. PubMed ID: 26391884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EQ-5D health utilities: exploring ways to improve upon responsiveness in psoriasis.
Pickard AS; Gooderham M; Hartz S; Nicolay C
J Med Econ; 2017 Jan; 20(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 27471948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey.
Longworth L; Yang Y; Young T; Mulhern B; Hernández Alava M; Mukuria C; Rowen D; Tosh J; Tsuchiya A; Evans P; Devianee Keetharuth A; Brazier J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(9):1-224. PubMed ID: 24524660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mapping QLQ-C30, HAQ, and MSIS-29 on EQ-5D.
Versteegh MM; Leunis A; Luime JJ; Boggild M; Uyl-de Groot CA; Stolk EA
Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):554-68. PubMed ID: 22114301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 to the preference-based EQ-5D, SF-6D, and 15D instruments.
Kontodimopoulos N; Aletras VH; Paliouras D; Niakas D
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1151-7. PubMed ID: 19558372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mapping EORTC-QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L in patients with colorectal cancer.
Marriott ER; van Hazel G; Gibbs P; Hatswell AJ
J Med Econ; 2017 Feb; 20(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 27676291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating the relationship between preference-based generic utility instruments and disease-specific quality-of-life measures in severe chronic constipation: challenges in practice.
Parker M; Haycox A; Graves J
Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Aug; 29(8):719-30. PubMed ID: 21635017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does quality of life of COPD patients as measured by the generic EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire differentiate between COPD severity stages?
Rutten-van Mölken MP; Oostenbrink JB; Tashkin DP; Burkhart D; Monz BU
Chest; 2006 Oct; 130(4):1117-28. PubMed ID: 17035446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of health state in patients with tinnitus: a comparison of the EQ-5D and HUI mark III.
Maes IH; Joore MA; Cima RF; Vlaeyen JW; Anteunis LJ
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 21221004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Responsiveness of the generic EQ-5D summary measure compared to the disease-specific EORTC QLQ C-30.
Krabbe PF; Peerenboom L; Langenhoff BS; Ruers TJ
Qual Life Res; 2004 Sep; 13(7):1247-53. PubMed ID: 15473503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a disease-specific version of the EQ-5D-5L for use in patients suffering from psoriasis: lessons learned from a feasibility study in the UK.
Swinburn P; Lloyd A; Boye KS; Edson-Heredia E; Bowman L; Janssen B
Value Health; 2013 Dec; 16(8):1156-62. PubMed ID: 24326169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of contemporaneous responses for EQ-5D-3L and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure; a case for disease specific multiattribute utility instrument in cardiovascular conditions.
Kularatna S; Byrnes J; Chan YK; Carrington MJ; Stewart S; Scuffham PA
Int J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 227():172-176. PubMed ID: 27865116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing the validity and responsiveness of a new cancer-specific health utility measure (FACT-8D) in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma, and comparison to EQ-5D-5L.
Herdman M; Kerr C; Pavesi M; Garside J; Lloyd A; Cubi-Molla P; Devlin N
J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2020 Mar; 4(1):22. PubMed ID: 32219576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
