These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23246668)

  • 1. Permeability of iron sulfide (FeS)-based materials for groundwater remediation.
    Henderson AD; Demond AH
    Water Res; 2013 Mar; 47(3):1267-76. PubMed ID: 23246668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating dominant processes in ZVI permeable reactive barriers using reactive transport modeling.
    Weber A; Ruhl AS; Amos RT
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Aug; 151():68-82. PubMed ID: 23743511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FeS-coated sand for removal of arsenic(III) under anaerobic conditions in permeable reactive barriers.
    Han YS; Gallegos TJ; Demond AH; Hayes KF
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):593-604. PubMed ID: 20974481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ten year performance evaluation of a field-scale zero-valent iron permeable reactive barrier installed to remediate trichloroethene contaminated groundwater.
    Phillips DH; Van Nooten T; Bastiaens L; Russell MI; Dickson K; Plant S; Ahad JM; Newton T; Elliot T; Kalin RM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(10):3861-9. PubMed ID: 20420442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Zero valent iron remediation of a mixed brominated ethene contaminated groundwater.
    Cohen EL; Patterson BM; McKinley AJ; Prommer H
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Jan; 103(3-4):109-18. PubMed ID: 18990465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Zero valent iron reduces toxicity and concentrations of organophosphate pesticides in contaminated groundwater.
    Fjordbøge AS; Baun A; Vastrup T; Kjeldsen P
    Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(2):627-33. PubMed ID: 23021613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immobilization of aqueous Hg(II) by mackinawite (FeS).
    Liu J; Valsaraj KT; Devai I; DeLaune RD
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Sep; 157(2-3):432-40. PubMed ID: 18280650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of zeolites in permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) for in-situ groundwater remediation: A critical review.
    Zhang Y; Cao B; Yin H; Meng L; Jin W; Wang F; Xu J; Al-Tabbaa A
    Chemosphere; 2022 Dec; 308(Pt 1):136290. PubMed ID: 36058373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of zero-valent iron for groundwater remediation and wastewater treatment: a review.
    Fu F; Dionysiou DD; Liu H
    J Hazard Mater; 2014 Feb; 267():194-205. PubMed ID: 24457611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 2. Geochemical modeling and solid phase studies.
    Beak DG; Wilkin RT
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):15-28. PubMed ID: 19167132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling the long-term performance of zero-valent iron using a spatio-temporal approach for iron aging.
    Kouznetsova I; Bayer P; Ebert M; Finkel M
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Feb; 90(1-2):58-80. PubMed ID: 17113680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term performance evaluation of zero-valent iron amended permeable reactive barriers for groundwater remediation - A mechanistic approach.
    Lawrinenko M; Kurwadkar S; Wilkin RT
    Geosci Front; 2023 Mar; 14(2):1-13. PubMed ID: 36760680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Passivation of zero-valent iron by denitrifying bacteria and the impact on trichloroethene reduction in groundwater.
    Chen L; Jin S; Fallgren PH; Liu F; Colberg PJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(6):1254-9. PubMed ID: 23508149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimate of the optimum weight ratio in zero-valent iron/pumice granular mixtures used in permeable reactive barriers for the remediation of nickel contaminated groundwater.
    Calabrò PS; Moraci N; Suraci P
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Mar; 207-208():111-6. PubMed ID: 21885195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sequential coupling of bio-augmented permeable reactive barriers for remediation of 1,1,1-trichloroethane contaminated groundwater.
    Wang W; Wu Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(12):12042-12054. PubMed ID: 30827025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calcium carbonate-based permeable reactive barriers for iron and manganese groundwater remediation at landfills.
    Wang Y; Pleasant S; Jain P; Powell J; Townsend T
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jul; 53():128-35. PubMed ID: 26992666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stability of multi-permeable reactive barriers for long term removal of mixed contaminants.
    Lee JY; Lee KJ; Youm SY; Lee MR; Kamala-Kannan S; Oh BT
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010 Feb; 84(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 19949770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 1. Hydrogeochemical studies.
    Wilkin RT; Acree SD; Ross RR; Beak DG; Lee TR
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19167133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hydrogeochemical and biological processes affecting the long-term performance of an iron-based permeable reactive barrier.
    Zolla V; Freyria FS; Sethi R; Di Molfetta A
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(3):897-908. PubMed ID: 19329678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of dissolved silica on arsenite removal by nano-particulate FeS and FeS-coated sand.
    Han YS; Demond AH; Hayes KF
    Chemosphere; 2013 Jul; 92(4):477-81. PubMed ID: 23538091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.