These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1489 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23247579)

  • 1. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France.
    Hassan C; Benamouzig R; Spada C; Ponchon T; Zullo A; Saurin JC; Costamagna G
    Endoscopy; 2011 Sep; 43(9):780-93. PubMed ID: 21623557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
    Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.
    Frazier AL; Colditz GA; Fuchs CS; Kuntz KM
    JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(15):1954-61. PubMed ID: 11035892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM
    Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia.
    Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A
    Gastroenterology; 2016 Sep; 151(3):427-439.e6. PubMed ID: 27311556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening based on risk for colorectal cancer is the most cost-effective approach.
    Dan YY; Chuah BY; Koh DC; Yeoh KG
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Mar; 10(3):266-71.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22100624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
    Phisalprapa P; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
    J Med Econ; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 31560247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening with stool DNA testing in intermediate-incidence countries.
    Wu GH; Wang YM; Yen AM; Wong JM; Lai HC; Warwick J; Chen TH
    BMC Cancer; 2006 May; 6():136. PubMed ID: 16723013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer with low-dose aspirin in combination with endoscopy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Hassan C; Rex DK; Cooper GS; Zullo A; Launois R; Benamouzig R
    Gut; 2012 Aug; 61(8):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21997545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reappraisal of the options for colorectal cancer screening in England.
    Whyte S; Chilcott J; Halloran S
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Sep; 14(9):e547-61. PubMed ID: 22390210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrasting Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Under Commercial Insurance vs. Medicare.
    Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A; Brill JV; Levin Z; Bundorf KM
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 Dec; 113(12):1836-1847. PubMed ID: 29904156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness simulation and analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong Chinese population: comparison amongst colonoscopy, guaiac and immunologic fecal occult blood testing.
    Wong CK; Lam CL; Wan YF; Fong DY
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():705. PubMed ID: 26471036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programmes using sigmoidoscopy and immunochemical faecal occult blood test.
    Senore C; Hassan C; Regge D; Pagano E; Iussich G; Correale L; Segnan N
    J Med Screen; 2019 Jun; 26(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 30180780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening methods in Iran.
    Allameh Z; Davari M; Emami MH
    Arch Iran Med; 2011 Mar; 14(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 21361717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
    Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-Effectiveness of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing vs Colonoscopy or Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Alaska Native People.
    Redwood DG; Dinh TA; Kisiel JB; Borah BJ; Moriarty JP; Provost EM; Sacco FD; Tiesinga JJ; Ahlquist DA
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2021 May; 96(5):1203-1217. PubMed ID: 33840520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.
    Hassan C; Zullo A; Laghi A; Reitano I; Taggi F; Cerro P; Iafrate F; Giustini M; Winn S; Morini S
    Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 17112797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 75.