159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23247864)
1. Computer-aided breast cancer detection using mammograms: a review.
Ganesan K; Acharya UR; Chua CK; Min LC; Abraham KT; Ng KH
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng; 2013; 6():77-98. PubMed ID: 23247864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial.
Brem RF; Baum J; Lechner M; Kaplan S; Souders S; Naul LG; Hoffmeister J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Sep; 181(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 12933460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.
Gur D; Sumkin JH; Rockette HE; Ganott M; Hakim C; Hardesty L; Poller WR; Shah R; Wallace L
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 14759985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Boetes C; Flobbe K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 19418215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical value of computer aided detection system in direct full-field digital mammography: a preliminary evaluation].
Sun Z; Li S; Xu HM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jun; 85(24):1692-5. PubMed ID: 16251074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computerized analysis of images in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.
Giger ML
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2004 Oct; 25(5):411-8. PubMed ID: 15559124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ductal carcinoma in situ: computer-aided detection in screening mammography.
Pai VR; Gregory NE; Swinford AE; Rebner M
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 17053200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support.
Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Rijken H; Holland R
Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S123-6. PubMed ID: 17209117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interpretation time of computer-aided detection at screening mammography.
Tchou PM; Haygood TM; Atkinson EN; Stephens TW; Davis PL; Arribas EM; Geiser WR; Whitman GJ
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 20679448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pectoral muscle segmentation: a review.
Ganesan K; Acharya UR; Chua KC; Min LC; Abraham KT
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Apr; 110(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 23270962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single reading with computer-aided detection performed by selected radiologists in a breast cancer screening program.
Bargalló X; Santamaría G; Del Amo M; Arguis P; Ríos J; Grau J; Burrel M; Cores E; Velasco M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Nov; 83(11):2019-23. PubMed ID: 25193778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided detection in diagnostic mammography: detection of clinically unsuspected cancers.
Butler SA; Gabbay RJ; Kass DA; Siedler DE; O'shaughnessy KF; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Nov; 183(5):1511-5. PubMed ID: 15505329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
