130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23248464)
1. The sensitivity and specificity of computerized brush biopsy and scalpel biopsy in diagnosing oral premalignant lesions: A comparative study.
Reddy SG; Kanala S; Chigurupati A; Kumar SR; Poosarla CS; Reddy BV
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2012 Sep; 16(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 23248464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of Oral Brush Biopsy without Computer-Assisted Analysis in Oral Premalignant and Malignant Lesions: A Study.
Trakroo A; Sunil MK; Trivedi A; Garg R; Kulkarni A; Arora S
J Int Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 7(3):33-8. PubMed ID: 25878476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of an oral brush biopsy without computer-assisted analysis in the evaluation of oral lesions: a study of 94 patients.
Mehrotra R; Singh MK; Pandya S; Singh M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 18644521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of oral brush cytology in the evaluation of the oral premalignant and malignant lesions.
Babshet M; Nandimath K; Pervatikar S; Naikmasur V
J Cytol; 2011 Oct; 28(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 22090689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical correlative study on early detection of oral cancer and precancerous lesions by modified oral brush biopsy and cytology followed by histopathology.
Gupta S; Shah JS; Parikh S; Limbdiwala P; Goel S
J Cancer Res Ther; 2014; 10(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 25022371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The efficacy of oral brush biopsy with computer-assisted analysis in identifying precancerous and cancerous lesions.
Mehrotra R; Mishra S; Singh M; Singh M
Head Neck Oncol; 2011 Aug; 3():39. PubMed ID: 21864339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of brush biopsy findings and salivary LDH levels in oral mucosal lesions of tobacco users.
Davidson SP; Kumar S; Somasundaram E; Jaishankar S
Indian J Dent Res; 2023; 34(2):191-195. PubMed ID: 37787211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a Modified Liquid-Based Cytology using OralCDx Brush in early detection of oral potentially malignant lesions and oral cancer.
Delavarian Z; Mohtasham N; Mosannen-Mozafari P; Pakfetrat A; Shakeri MT; Ghafoorian-Maddah R
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2010 Sep; 15(5):e671-6. PubMed ID: 20383114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An audit of the efficacy of the oral brush biopsy technique in a specialist Oral Medicine unit.
Poate TW; Buchanan JA; Hodgson TA; Speight PM; Barrett AW; Moles DR; Scully C; Porter SR
Oral Oncol; 2004 Sep; 40(8):829-34. PubMed ID: 15288839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liquid-based oral brush cytology in the diagnosis of oral leukoplakia using a modified Bethesda Cytology system.
Alsarraf A; Kujan O; Farah CS
J Oral Pathol Med; 2018 Oct; 47(9):887-894. PubMed ID: 29957892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [DNA cytometry of exfoliated cells in the diagnosis of oral potential malignant disorders].
Liu Y; Gao Y; Chen XJ; Hua H
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 30773538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving detection of precancerous and cancerous oral lesions. Computer-assisted analysis of the oral brush biopsy. U.S. Collaborative OralCDx Study Group.
Sciubba JJ
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1445-57. PubMed ID: 10570588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of oral brush cytology cell block immunocytochemistry in the diagnosis of oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Kujan O; Idrees M; Anand N; Soh B; Wong E; Farah CS
J Oral Pathol Med; 2021 May; 50(5):451-458. PubMed ID: 33368584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective, blinded comparison of cytology and DNA-image cytometry of brush biopsies for early detection of oral malignancy.
Kämmerer PW; Koch FP; Santoro M; Babaryka G; Biesterfeld S; Brieger J; Kunkel M
Oral Oncol; 2013 May; 49(5):420-6. PubMed ID: 23318121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Efficacy of Sediment Cytology over Oral Brush Cytology in Oral Leukoplakia.
Hosmani JV; Pujari VK; Kotrashetti VS; Nayak RS; Babji DV; Patanshetti SM
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(4):368-374. PubMed ID: 31593966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low positive predictive value of the oral brush biopsy in detecting dysplastic oral lesions.
Bhoopathi V; Kabani S; Mascarenhas AK
Cancer; 2009 Mar; 115(5):1036-40. PubMed ID: 19165806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The utility of toluidine blue staining and brush cytology as adjuncts in clinical examination of suspicious oral mucosal lesions.
Güneri P; Epstein JB; Kaya A; Veral A; Kazandı A; Boyacioglu H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 21112183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of computer-assisted brush biopsy results with follow up scalpel biopsy and histology.
Svirsky JA; Burns JC; Carpenter WM; Cohen DM; Bhattacharyya I; Fantasia JE; Lederman DA; Lynch DP; Sciubba JJ; Zunt SL
Gen Dent; 2002; 50(6):500-3. PubMed ID: 12572180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis of two computer-assisted screening methods for diagnosing oral precancer and cancer.
Ye X; Zhang J; Tan Y; Chen G; Zhou G
Oral Oncol; 2015 Nov; 51(11):966-975. PubMed ID: 26384539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral leukoplakia - is biopsy at the initial appointment a must?
Mutalik S; Mutalik VS; Pai KM; Naikmasur VG; Phaik KS
J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Aug; 8(8):ZC04-7. PubMed ID: 25302256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
