These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23249445)

  • 1. "Who writes what?" Using written comments in team-based assessment to better understand medical student performance: a mixed-methods study.
    White JS; Sharma N
    BMC Med Educ; 2012 Dec; 12():123. PubMed ID: 23249445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Team-based assessment of medical students in a clinical clerkship is feasible and acceptable.
    Sharma N; Cui Y; Leighton JP; White JS
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(7):555-61. PubMed ID: 22746962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To What Degree Are the 13 Entrustable Professional Activities Already Incorporated Into Physicians' Performance Schemas for Medical Students?
    Colbert-Getz JM; Lappe K; Northrup M; Roussel D
    Teach Learn Med; 2019; 31(4):361-369. PubMed ID: 30873878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How Do Surgery Students Use Written Language to Say What They See? A Framework to Understand Medical Students' Written Evaluations of Their Teachers.
    Lim DW; White JS
    Acad Med; 2015 Nov; 90(11 Suppl):S98-S106. PubMed ID: 26505109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving medical students' written communication skills: design and evaluation of an educational curriculum.
    Melvin L; Connolly K; Pitre L; Dore KL; Wasi P
    Postgrad Med J; 2015 Jun; 91(1076):303-8. PubMed ID: 25814511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Competency assessment form to improve feedback.
    Hauer KE; Nishimura H; Dubon D; Teherani A; Boscardin C
    Clin Teach; 2018 Dec; 15(6):472-477. PubMed ID: 29045060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does what we write matter? Determining the features of high- and low-quality summative written comments of students on the internal medicine clerkship using pile-sort and consensus analysis: a mixed-methods study.
    Gulbas L; Guerin W; Ryder HF
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 May; 16():145. PubMed ID: 27177917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Tweet"-Format Writing Is an Effective Tool for Medical Student Reflection.
    Dressler JA; Ryder BA; Connolly M; Blais MD; Miner TJ; Harrington DT
    J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(5):1206-1210. PubMed ID: 29576247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The open-ended comment space for action plans on core clerkship students' encounter cards: what gets written?
    Sokol-Hessner L; Shea JA; Kogan JR
    Acad Med; 2010 Oct; 85(10 Suppl):S110-4. PubMed ID: 20881692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgery Clerkship Evaluations Are Insufficient for Clinical Skills Appraisal: The Value of a Medical Student Surgical Objective Structured Clinical Examination.
    Butler KL; Hirsh DA; Petrusa ER; Yeh DD; Stearns D; Sloane DE; Linder JA; Basu G; Thompson LA; de Moya MA
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(2):286-294. PubMed ID: 27692808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Written feedback and continuity of learning in a geographically distributed medical education program.
    Harvey P; Radomski N; O'Connor D
    Med Teach; 2013 Dec; 35(12):1009-13. PubMed ID: 23971889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Faculty member feedback reports.
    Pincavage A; Cifu A
    Clin Teach; 2015 Feb; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 25603709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Written feedback on supervised learning events.
    Nesbitt A; Pitcher A; James L; Sturrock A; Griffin A
    Clin Teach; 2014 Jul; 11(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 24917097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of written standardized feedback on the structure and quality of surgical lectures: A prospective cohort study.
    Sterz J; Höfer SH; Bender B; Janko M; Adili F; Ruesseler M
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Nov; 16(1):292. PubMed ID: 27842580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Which characteristics of written feedback are perceived as stimulating students' reflective competence: an exploratory study.
    Dekker H; Schönrock-Adema J; Snoek JW; van der Molen T; Cohen-Schotanus J
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Jul; 13():94. PubMed ID: 23829790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhancing Medical Student Education and Combating Mistreatment During a Surgery Clerkship With a Novel Educational Tool: A Pilot Study.
    Portelli Tremont JN; Kratzke IM; Williford ML; Pascarella L
    J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 32600892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positive Outcomes of Optimizing Student-Preceptor Continuity in a Traditional Block Clerkship.
    Biggs JL; Sutherell JS; Remus R; Armbrecht ES; King MA
    Teach Learn Med; 2018; 30(2):202-212. PubMed ID: 29364752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond "Read More": An Intervention to Improve Faculty Written Feedback to Learners.
    Zelenski AB; Tischendorf JS; Kessler M; Saunders S; MacDonald MM; Vogelman B; Zakowski L
    J Grad Med Educ; 2019 Aug; 11(4):468-471. PubMed ID: 31440343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a Preceptorship Model on Third-Year General Surgery Clerkship.
    Geary AD; Pernar LI; Chugh PV; Carter CO
    J Am Coll Surg; 2020 Jun; 230(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 32315744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in Self-expression Reflect Formal Evaluation in a Fourth-year Emergency Medicine Clerkship.
    Chary M; Leuthauser A; Hu K; Hexom B
    West J Emerg Med; 2017 Jan; 18(1):174-180. PubMed ID: 28116033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.