386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23249893)
1. A biomechanical comparison of one-third tubular plates versus periarticular plates for fixation of osteoporotic distal fibula fractures.
Davis AT; Israel H; Cannada LK; Bledsoe JG
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Sep; 27(9):e201-7. PubMed ID: 23249893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Versus Conventional Plate Fixation for Distal Fibula Fractures in Trimalleolar Ankle Injuries.
Nguyentat A; Camisa W; Patel S; Lagaay P
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(1):132-5. PubMed ID: 26497086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of 4 different lateral plate constructs for distal fibula fractures.
Eckel TT; Glisson RR; Anand P; Parekh SG
Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Nov; 34(11):1588-95. PubMed ID: 23818460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of modern locked plating and antiglide plating for fixation of osteoporotic distal fibular fractures.
Switaj PJ; Wetzel RJ; Jain NP; Weatherford BM; Ren Y; Zhang LQ; Merk BR
Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Sep; 22(3):158-163. PubMed ID: 27502223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A biomechanical evaluation of locked plating for distal fibula fractures in an osteoporotic sawbone model.
Bariteau JT; Fantry A; Blankenhorn B; Lareau C; Paller D; Digiovanni CW
Foot Ankle Surg; 2014 Mar; 20(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 24480499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A contoured locking plate for distal fibular fractures in osteoporotic bone: a biomechanical cadaver study.
Zahn RK; Frey S; Jakubietz RG; Jakubietz MG; Doht S; Schneider P; Waschke J; Meffert RH
Injury; 2012 Jun; 43(6):718-25. PubMed ID: 21813124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Locking versus nonlocking construct in an osteoporotic, segmental fibula defect model.
Lo EY; Tseng SS; Christiansen BA; Lee MA; Yoo BJ
Orthopedics; 2013 Oct; 36(10):e1262-8. PubMed ID: 24093701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of lateral locking plate and antiglide plate for fixation of distal fibular fractures in osteoporotic bone: a biomechanical study.
Minihane KP; Lee C; Ahn C; Zhang LQ; Merk BR
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Sep; 20(8):562-6. PubMed ID: 16990728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of a lateral polyaxial locking plate with a posterolateral polyaxial locking plate applied to the distal fibula.
Hallbauer J; Klos K; Rausch S; Gräfenstein A; Wipf F; Beimel C; Hofmann G; Mückley T
Foot Ankle Surg; 2014 Sep; 20(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 25103705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Locking plates in osteoporosis: a biomechanical cadaveric study of diaphyseal humerus fractures.
Davis C; Stall A; Knutsen E; Whitney A; Becker E; Hsieh AH; OʼToole RV
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Apr; 26(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 22068207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fixation of osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: A biomechanical comparison of locking versus conventional plates.
Kim T; Ayturk UM; Haskell A; Miclau T; Puttlitz CM
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2007; 46(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 17198946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does a volar locking plate provide equivalent stability as a dorsal nonlocking plate in a dorsally comminuted distal radius fracture?: a biomechanical study.
Kandemir U; Matityahu A; Desai R; Puttlitz C
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Oct; 22(9):605-10. PubMed ID: 18827589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distal fibula fracture fixation: Biomechanical evaluation of three different fixation implants.
Knutsen AR; Sangiorgio SN; Liu C; Zhou S; Warganich T; Fleming J; Harris TG; Ebramzadeh E
Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(4):278-285. PubMed ID: 27810029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Locking versus nonlocking T-plates for dorsal and volar fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study.
Trease C; McIff T; Toby EB
J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):756-63. PubMed ID: 16039369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of augmentation methods for internal fixation of osteoporotic ankle fractures.
Panchbhavi VK; Vallurupalli S; Morris R
Foot Ankle Int; 2009 Jul; 30(7):696-703. PubMed ID: 19589319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual Nonlocked Plating as an Alternative to Locked Plating for Comminuted Distal Fibula Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison Study.
Randall RM; Nagle T; Steckler A; Billow D; Berkowitz MJ
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Sep; 58(5):916-919. PubMed ID: 31345755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Locking Versus Nonlocking Plates for Distal Fibula Fractures.
Lyle SA; Malik C; Oddy MJ
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2018; 57(4):664-667. PubMed ID: 29681437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Locked plating of comminuted distal femur fractures: does unlocked screw placement affect stability and failure?
Cui S; Bledsoe JG; Israel H; Watson JT; Cannada LK
J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Feb; 28(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 23860132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can locking screws allow smaller, low-profile plates to achieve comparable stability to larger, standard plates?
Garrigues GE; Glisson RR; Garrigues NW; Richard MJ; Ruch DS
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Jun; 25(6):347-54. PubMed ID: 21577070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
