These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Mechanical characteristics of locking and compression plate constructs applied dorsally to distal radius fractures. Boswell S; McIff TE; Trease CA; Toby EB J Hand Surg Am; 2007; 32(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 17481999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Internal fixation of type-C distal femoral fractures in osteoporotic bone. Wähnert D; Hoffmeier KL; von Oldenburg G; Fröber R; Hofmann GO; Mückley T J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jun; 92(6):1442-52. PubMed ID: 20516320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How much do locked screws add to the fixation of "hybrid" plate constructs in osteoporotic bone? Freeman AL; Tornetta P; Schmidt A; Bechtold J; Ricci W; Fleming M J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Mar; 24(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 20182252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates for the fixation of calcaneal fractures. Redfern DJ; Oliveira ML; Campbell JT; Belkoff SM Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Mar; 27(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 16539902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of the mechanical properties of locking plates with and without screw hole inserts. Eichinger JK; Herzog JP; Arrington ED Orthopedics; 2011 Jan; 34(1):19. PubMed ID: 21210620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro biomechanical testing of the 3.5 mm LCP in torsion: a comparison of unicortical locking to bicortical nonlocking screws placed nearest the fracture gap. Padron AA; Owen JR; Wayne JS; Aktay SA; Barnes RF BMC Res Notes; 2017 Dec; 10(1):768. PubMed ID: 29282136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Stability of locking and non-locking plates in an osteoporotic calcaneal fracture model. Illert T; Rammelt S; Drewes T; Grass R; Zwipp H Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Mar; 32(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 21477551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities. Schuster I; Korner J; Arzdorf M; Schwieger K; Diederichs G; Linke B J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 18349779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Complex distal humerus fractures-comparison of polyaxial locking and nonlocking screw configurations-a preliminary biomechanical study. Hungerer S; Wipf F; von Oldenburg G; Augat P; Penzkofer R J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Mar; 28(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 23736772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Surgical treatment of midclavicular fractures in the elderly: a comparison of locking and nonlocking plates. Pai HT; Lee YS; Cheng CY Orthopedics; 2009 Apr; 32(4):. PubMed ID: 19388617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of pigeon (Columba livia) cadaver intact humeri and ostectomized humeri stabilized with caudally applied titanium locking plate or stainless steel nonlocking plate constructs. Darrow BG; Biskup JJ; Weigel JP; Jones MP; Xie X; Liaw PK; Tharpe JL; Sharma A; Penumadu D Am J Vet Res; 2017 May; 78(5):570-578. PubMed ID: 28441055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical testing of locking and nonlocking plates in the canine scapula. Acquaviva AE; Miller EI; Eisenmann DJ; Stone RT; Kraus KH J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2012; 48(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 23033465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical evaluation of a locking and nonlocking reconstruction plate in an osteoporotic calcaneal fracture model. Blake MH; Owen JR; Sanford TS; Wayne JS; Adelaar RS Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Apr; 32(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 21733448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]