221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23250159)
1. The effect of composite fiber insertion along with low-shrinking composite resin on cuspal deflection of root-filled maxillary premolars.
Oskoee SS; Oskoee PA; Navimipour EJ; Ajami AA; Zonuz GA; Bahari M; Pournaghiazar F
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):595-601. PubMed ID: 23250159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of two types of composite fibers on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an in vitro study.
Oskoee PA; Chaharom ME; Kimyai S; Oskoee JS; Varasteh S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 22186687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays.
Salaverry A; Borges GA; Mota EG; Burnett Júnior LH; Spohr AM
J Adhes Dent; 2013 Dec; 15(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 23653900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite Element Analysis of the Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars restored with Composite Resin along with Glass Fiber Insertion in Various Positions.
Navimipour EJ; Firouzmandi M; Mirhashemi FS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Apr; 16(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 26067731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses.
Scotti N; Rota R; Scansetti M; Paolino DS; Chiandussi G; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 24095213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of three composite fiber insertion techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth.
Oskoee PA; Ajami AA; Navimipour EJ; Oskoee SS; Sadjadi J
J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):413-6. PubMed ID: 19249607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of using silorane-based resin composite for restoring conservative cavities on the changes in cuspal deflection.
Shabayek NM; Hassan FM; Mobarak EH
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):E1-8. PubMed ID: 23088187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture strength of root filled premolar teeth restored with silorane and methacrylate-based resin composite.
Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Bagheri R; Abu Holy A
J Dent; 2015 Jun; 43(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 25656772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods.
Mergulhão VA; de Mendonça LS; de Albuquerque MS; Braz R
Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro.
Hofmann N; Just N; Haller B; Hugo B; Klaiber B
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Jun; 2(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 15490780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars.
Oskoee SS; Oskoee PA; Navimipour EJ; Shahi S
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 17910229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with class II MOD cavities restored with Ormocer, Nanofilled, and Nanoceramic composite restorative systems.
Taha DG; Abdel-Samad AA; Mahmoud SH
Quintessence Int; 2011; 42(7):579-87. PubMed ID: 21716986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
