414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23250736)
1. DNA ploidy is an independent predictor of survival in breast invasive ductal carcinoma: a long-term multivariate analysis of 393 patients.
Pinto AE; Pereira T; Santos M; Branco M; Dias A; Silva GL; Ferreira MC; André S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 May; 20(5):1530-7. PubMed ID: 23250736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [DNA ploidy is an independent prognostic biomarker in breast invasive ductal carcinoma].
Pinto AE; Pereira T; Silva GL; Ferreira MC; André S
Acta Med Port; 2012; 25(6):399-407. PubMed ID: 23534591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA flow cytometry but not telomerase activity as predictor of disease-free survival in pT1-2/N0/G2 breast cancer.
Pinto AE; André S; Pereira T; Silva G; Soares J
Pathobiology; 2006; 73(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 16943686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined flow cytometry determination of S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy is an independent prognostic factor in node-negative invasive breast carcinoma: analysis of a series of 271 patients with stage I and II breast cancer.
Moureau-Zabotto L; Bouchet C; Cesari D; Uzan S; Lefranc JP; Antoine M; Genestie C; Deniaud-Alexandre E; Bernaudin JF; Touboul E; Fleury-Feith J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2005 May; 91(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 15868432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Combined flow cytometry determination of S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy is an independent prognostic factor in node-negative invasive breast carcinoma: review of a series of 271 patients with stage I and II breast cancer].
Moureau-Zabotto L; Bouchet C; Cesari D; Uzan S; Lefranc JP; Antoine M; Genestie C; Deniaud-Alexandre E; Bernaudin JF; Touboul E; Fleury-Feith J
Cancer Radiother; 2005 Dec; 9(8):575-86. PubMed ID: 16243560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. S-phase fraction determined on fine needle aspirates is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer - a multivariate study of 770 patients.
Gazic B; Pizem J; Bracko M; Cufer T; Borstnar S; Pohar-Marinsek Z; Us-Krasovec M
Cytopathology; 2008 Oct; 19(5):294-302. PubMed ID: 18070112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A retrospective review with long term follow up of 11,400 cases of pure mucinous breast carcinoma.
Di Saverio S; Gutierrez J; Avisar E
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Oct; 111(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 18026874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aneuploidy identifies subsets of patients with poor clinical outcome in grade 1 and grade 2 breast cancer.
Pinto AE; Pereira T; Silva GL; André S
Breast; 2015 Aug; 24(4):449-55. PubMed ID: 25920680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of breast cancer with estrogen- and progesterone-receptor negative and HER-2 overexpression].
Fan Y; Guan Y; Zhao WH; Li Q; Xu BH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 30(12):917-20. PubMed ID: 19173993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term significance of DNA ploidy and cell proliferation in breast carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic markers in a series of 308 patients.
Pinto AE; André S; Soares J
J Clin Pathol; 1999 Aug; 52(8):604-11. PubMed ID: 10645231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy in 633 T1T2 breast cancers: a standardized flow cytometric study.
Chassevent A; Jourdan ML; Romain S; Descotes F; Colonna M; Martin PM; Bolla M; Spyratos F
Clin Cancer Res; 2001 Apr; 7(4):909-17. PubMed ID: 11309341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of DNA image cytometry in Libyan breast cancer.
Ermiah E; Abdalla F; Buhmeida A; Alshrad M; Salem N; Pyrhönen S; Collan Y
Oncology; 2012; 83(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 22906963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mutant p53 expression and DNA analysis in human breast cancer comparison with conventional clinicopathological parameters.
Rosanelli GP; Steindorfer P; Wirnsberger GH; Klimpfinger M; Ratschek M; Puerstner P; Auner H; Berhold A
Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(2):581-6. PubMed ID: 7763041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. C-erbB-2 oncoprotein overexpression identifies a subgroup of estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer patients with poor prognosis.
Pinto AE; André S; Pereira T; Nóbrega S; Soares J
Ann Oncol; 2001 Apr; 12(4):525-33. PubMed ID: 11398888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcome of pure mucinous breast carcinoma compared to infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a population-based study from China.
Cao AY; He M; Liu ZB; Di GH; Wu J; Lu JS; Liu GY; Shen ZZ; Shao ZM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):3019-27. PubMed ID: 22451233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Independent prognostic value of hormone receptor expression and S-phase fraction in advanced breast cancer.
Pinto AE; Mendonça E; André S; Nóbrega SD; Soares J
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2002 Dec; 24(6):345-54. PubMed ID: 12508694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-color, cytokeratin-labeled dna flow cytometric analysis of 332 breast cancers: lack of prognostic value with 12-year follow-up.
Prasad AR; Divine G; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2001 Mar; 125(3):364-74. PubMed ID: 11231485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prognostic value of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 in node positive breast cancer patients treated by mastectomy].
Wang SL; Li YX; Song YW; Wang WH; Jin J; Liu YP; Liu XF; Yu ZH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 32(7):520-5. PubMed ID: 21029696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with T1 breast carcinoma.
Barth A; Craig PH; Silverstein MJ
Cancer; 1997 May; 79(10):1918-22. PubMed ID: 9149018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Breast cancer: prognostic value of flow cytometry and hormone receptors. Apropos of a Lebanese series of patients].
Aftimos G; Trak-Smayra V; Moacdieh-Rehayel L
J Med Liban; 2000; 48(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 10881437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
