BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23250933)

  • 1. Combination aspirin and/or calcium chemoprevention with colonoscopy in colorectal cancer prevention: cost-effectiveness analyses.
    Pence BC; Belasco EJ; Lyford CP
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Mar; 22(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 23250933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer with low-dose aspirin in combination with endoscopy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Hassan C; Rex DK; Cooper GS; Zullo A; Launois R; Benamouzig R
    Gut; 2012 Aug; 61(8):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21997545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aspirin chemoprevention in patients with increased risk for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    DuPont AW; Arguedas MR; Wilcox CM
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Aug; 26(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 17635378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer by aspirin: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Suleiman S; Rex DK; Sonnenberg A
    Gastroenterology; 2002 Jan; 122(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 11781283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cost-effectiveness of aspirin versus cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors for colorectal carcinoma chemoprevention in healthy individuals.
    Hur C; Simon LS; Gazelle GS
    Cancer; 2004 Jul; 101(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 15222006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Cooper K; Squires H; Carroll C; Papaioannou D; Booth A; Logan RF; Maguire C; Hind D; Tappenden P
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jun; 14(32):1-206. PubMed ID: 20594533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
    Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
    Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France.
    Hassan C; Benamouzig R; Spada C; Ponchon T; Zullo A; Saurin JC; Costamagna G
    Endoscopy; 2011 Sep; 43(9):780-93. PubMed ID: 21623557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surveillance colonoscopy is cost-effective for patients with adenomas who are at high risk of colorectal cancer.
    Saini SD; Schoenfeld P; Vijan S
    Gastroenterology; 2010 Jun; 138(7):2292-9, 2299.e1. PubMed ID: 20226186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel plus aspirin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in whom warfarin is unsuitable.
    Coleman CI; Straznitskas AD; Sobieraj DM; Kluger J; Anglade MW
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 109(7):1020-5. PubMed ID: 22221944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopist-directed propofol administration versus anesthesiologist assistance for colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Hassan C; Rex DK; Cooper GS; Benamouzig R
    Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):456-64. PubMed ID: 22531982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can colonoscopy remain cost-effective for colorectal cancer screening? The impact of practice patterns and the Will Rogers phenomenon on costs.
    Austin GL; Fennimore B; Ahnen DJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Mar; 108(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 23208273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?
    Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Bauerfeind P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Aug; 94(8):2268-74. PubMed ID: 10445561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for colorectal cancer.
    Barzi A; Lenz HJ; Quinn DI; Sadeghi S
    Cancer; 2017 May; 123(9):1516-1527. PubMed ID: 28117881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health benefits and costs of screening for colorectal cancer in people on dialysis or who have received a kidney transplant.
    Wong G; Li MW; Howard K; Hua DK; Chapman JR; Bourke M; Turner R; Tong A; Craig JC
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2013 Apr; 28(4):917-26. PubMed ID: 23182812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Kim DH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 May; 192(5):1332-40. PubMed ID: 19380558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aspirin as an adjunct to screening for prevention of sporadic colorectal cancer. A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Ladabaum U; Chopra CL; Huang G; Scheiman JM; Chernew ME; Fendrick AM
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Nov; 135(9):769-81. PubMed ID: 11694102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.