288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23250933)
1. Combination aspirin and/or calcium chemoprevention with colonoscopy in colorectal cancer prevention: cost-effectiveness analyses.
Pence BC; Belasco EJ; Lyford CP
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Mar; 22(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 23250933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer with low-dose aspirin in combination with endoscopy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hassan C; Rex DK; Cooper GS; Zullo A; Launois R; Benamouzig R
Gut; 2012 Aug; 61(8):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21997545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aspirin chemoprevention in patients with increased risk for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
DuPont AW; Arguedas MR; Wilcox CM
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Aug; 26(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 17635378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer by aspirin: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Suleiman S; Rex DK; Sonnenberg A
Gastroenterology; 2002 Jan; 122(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 11781283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The cost-effectiveness of aspirin versus cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors for colorectal carcinoma chemoprevention in healthy individuals.
Hur C; Simon LS; Gazelle GS
Cancer; 2004 Jul; 101(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 15222006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Cooper K; Squires H; Carroll C; Papaioannou D; Booth A; Logan RF; Maguire C; Hind D; Tappenden P
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jun; 14(32):1-206. PubMed ID: 20594533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France.
Hassan C; Benamouzig R; Spada C; Ponchon T; Zullo A; Saurin JC; Costamagna G
Endoscopy; 2011 Sep; 43(9):780-93. PubMed ID: 21623557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surveillance colonoscopy is cost-effective for patients with adenomas who are at high risk of colorectal cancer.
Saini SD; Schoenfeld P; Vijan S
Gastroenterology; 2010 Jun; 138(7):2292-9, 2299.e1. PubMed ID: 20226186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel plus aspirin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in whom warfarin is unsuitable.
Coleman CI; Straznitskas AD; Sobieraj DM; Kluger J; Anglade MW
Am J Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 109(7):1020-5. PubMed ID: 22221944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopist-directed propofol administration versus anesthesiologist assistance for colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hassan C; Rex DK; Cooper GS; Benamouzig R
Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):456-64. PubMed ID: 22531982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can colonoscopy remain cost-effective for colorectal cancer screening? The impact of practice patterns and the Will Rogers phenomenon on costs.
Austin GL; Fennimore B; Ahnen DJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Mar; 108(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 23208273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?
Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Bauerfeind P
Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Aug; 94(8):2268-74. PubMed ID: 10445561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for colorectal cancer.
Barzi A; Lenz HJ; Quinn DI; Sadeghi S
Cancer; 2017 May; 123(9):1516-1527. PubMed ID: 28117881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health benefits and costs of screening for colorectal cancer in people on dialysis or who have received a kidney transplant.
Wong G; Li MW; Howard K; Hua DK; Chapman JR; Bourke M; Turner R; Tong A; Craig JC
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2013 Apr; 28(4):917-26. PubMed ID: 23182812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 May; 192(5):1332-40. PubMed ID: 19380558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aspirin as an adjunct to screening for prevention of sporadic colorectal cancer. A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ladabaum U; Chopra CL; Huang G; Scheiman JM; Chernew ME; Fendrick AM
Ann Intern Med; 2001 Nov; 135(9):769-81. PubMed ID: 11694102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]