These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23251232)

  • 21. Modeling state-related fMRI activity using change-point theory.
    Lindquist MA; Waugh C; Wager TD
    Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(3):1125-41. PubMed ID: 17360198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Enhanced false discovery rate using Gaussian mixture models for thresholding fMRI statistical maps.
    Pendse G; Borsook D; Becerra L
    Neuroimage; 2009 Aug; 47(1):231-61. PubMed ID: 19269334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differential network knockoff filter with application to brain connectivity analysis.
    Ji J; Hou Z; He Y; Liu L; Xue F; Chen H; Yuan Z
    Stat Med; 2024 Sep; 43(20):3830-3861. PubMed ID: 38922944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Statistical detection of EEG synchrony using empirical bayesian inference.
    Singh AK; Asoh H; Takeda Y; Phillips S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121795. PubMed ID: 25822617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An improvement on local FDR analysis applied to functional MRI data.
    Lee N; Kim AY; Park CH; Kim SH
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jul; 267():115-25. PubMed ID: 27102044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A novel sparse group Gaussian graphical model for functional connectivity estimation.
    Ng B; Varoquaux G; Poline JB; Thirion B
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2013; 23():256-67. PubMed ID: 24683974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Infinite von Mises-Fisher Mixture Modeling of Whole Brain fMRI Data.
    Røge RE; Madsen KH; Schmidt MN; Mørup M
    Neural Comput; 2017 Oct; 29(10):2712-2741. PubMed ID: 28777721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ordinal Pattern: A New Descriptor for Brain Connectivity Networks.
    Zhang D; Huang J; Jie B; Du J; Tu L; Liu M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Jul; 37(7):1711-1722. PubMed ID: 29969421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynamic connectivity regression: determining state-related changes in brain connectivity.
    Cribben I; Haraldsdottir R; Atlas LY; Wager TD; Lindquist MA
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):907-20. PubMed ID: 22484408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dynamic Bayesian network modeling of fMRI: a comparison of group-analysis methods.
    Li J; Wang ZJ; Palmer SJ; McKeown MJ
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jun; 41(2):398-407. PubMed ID: 18406629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Brain networks construction using Bayes FDR and average power function.
    Quatto P; Margaritella N; Costantini I; Baglio F; Garegnani M; Nemni R; Pugnetti L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Mar; 29(3):866-878. PubMed ID: 31088219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative evaluation of wavelet-based methods for hypothesis testing of brain activation maps.
    Fadili MJ; Bullmore ET
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):1112-28. PubMed ID: 15528111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Physiologically informed dynamic causal modeling of fMRI data.
    Havlicek M; Roebroeck A; Friston K; Gardumi A; Ivanov D; Uludag K
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 122():355-72. PubMed ID: 26254113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Connectivity-informed fMRI activation detection.
    Ng B; Abugharbieh R; Varoquaux G; Poline JB; Thirion B
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 2):285-92. PubMed ID: 21995040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative evaluation of statistical inference in resting state functional MRI.
    Yang X; Kang H; Newton A; Landman BA
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 2):246-53. PubMed ID: 23286055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bayesian spatiotemporal modeling on complex-valued fMRI signals via kernel convolutions.
    Yu CH; Prado R; Ombao H; Rowe D
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):616-628. PubMed ID: 35143043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Bayesian hierarchical framework for modeling brain connectivity for neuroimaging data.
    Chen S; Bowman FD; Mayberg HS
    Biometrics; 2016 Jun; 72(2):596-605. PubMed ID: 26501687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Joint Bayesian Estimation of Voxel Activation and Inter-regional Connectivity in fMRI Experiments.
    Spencer D; Guhaniyogi R; Prado R
    Psychometrika; 2020 Dec; 85(4):845-869. PubMed ID: 32949345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis.
    Sato JR; Fujita A; Cardoso EF; Thomaz CE; Brammer MJ; Amaro E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1444-55. PubMed ID: 20472076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patterns of brain structural connectivity differentiate normal weight from overweight subjects.
    Gupta A; Mayer EA; Sanmiguel CP; Van Horn JD; Woodworth D; Ellingson BM; Fling C; Love A; Tillisch K; Labus JS
    Neuroimage Clin; 2015; 7():506-17. PubMed ID: 25737959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.