These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23252635)

  • 1. Should basic rights and lack of common sense and responsibility be regulated? Comments on whether access to in vitro fertilization should be regulated in the United States.
    Balon R
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2013; 39(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 23252635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Access to in vitro fertilization deserves increased regulation in the United States.
    Murphy JB
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2013; 39(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 23252634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Balancing competing interests over frozen embryos: the judgment of solomon? Evans v. United Kingdom.
    Annett T
    Med Law Rev; 2006; 14(3):425-33. PubMed ID: 16987925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Body, rights and comprehensive health: Analysis of the parliamentary debates on the Gender Identity and Assisted Fertilization Laws (Argentina, 2011-2013).
    Farji Neer A
    Salud Colect; 2015 Sep; 11(3):351-65. PubMed ID: 26418092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Substantial Shifts in Supreme Court Health Law Jurisprudence.
    Gostin LO; Hodge JG
    JAMA; 2018 Oct; 320(14):1431-1432. PubMed ID: 30193377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Costa Rica's absolute ban on in vitro fertilization deemed a human rights violation: implications for U.S. assisted reproductive technology policy and "personhood" initiatives.
    Crockin SL; Ribas D; Escalante G; Nussbaum L; Jones HW
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):330-3. PubMed ID: 23725805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human rights to in vitro fertilization.
    Zegers-Hochschild F; Dickens BM; Dughman-Manzur S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Oct; 123(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 23932062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brief of the Law Reform Commission of Canada to the Royal Commission on new reproductive technologies.
    Jones DJ
    Health Law Can; 1992; 13(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 10121310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproductive Health: Assessing the Damage.
    Rosenbaum S
    Milbank Q; 2019 Jun; 97(2):399-402. PubMed ID: 30977183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gender-based violence: a barrier to sexual and reproductive health and rights.
    Heidari S; Moreno CG
    Reprod Health Matters; 2016 May; 24(47):1-4. PubMed ID: 27578333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Global Survey of National Constitutions: Mapping Constitutional Commitments to Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights.
    Pizzarossa LB; Perehudoff K
    Health Hum Rights; 2017 Dec; 19(2):279-293. PubMed ID: 29302182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Ruling of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the Case of Artavia Murillo et al (in vitro fertilization) v. Costa Rica; new hopes for the reproductive freedom in Latin America].
    Brena I
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2013; (38):149-66. PubMed ID: 24340830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Migrant workers in Sabah, East Malaysia: The importance of legislation and policy to uphold equity on sexual and reproductive health and rights.
    Lasimbang HB; Tong WT; Low WY
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Apr; 32():113-23. PubMed ID: 26433811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The right to health].
    Willich SN
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2007 Sep; 50(9):1111-2. PubMed ID: 17828471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward a gender-sensitive assisted reproduction policy.
    Donchin A
    Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 19076940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Status of Women's Reproductive Rights and Adverse Birth Outcomes.
    Wallace ME; Evans MG; Theall K
    Womens Health Issues; 2017; 27(2):121-128. PubMed ID: 28131388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of parliamentarians in promoting sexual and reproductive health and rights.
    McCafferty C
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Aug; 106(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 19535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Invoking health and human rights to ensure access to legal abortion: the case of a nine-year-old girl from Nicaragua.
    McNaughton Reyes HL; Hord CE; Mitchell EM; Blandon MM
    Health Hum Rights; 2006; 9(2):62-86. PubMed ID: 17265755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disputes over frozen embryos: who wins, who loses, and how do we decide?--An analysis of Davis v. Davis, York v. Jones, and state statutes affecting reproductive choices.
    Ahnen CD
    Creighton Law Rev; 1991 Jun; 24(4):1299-357. PubMed ID: 16130262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.