These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23252665)

  • 21. The Youden Index and the optimal cut-point corrected for measurement error.
    Perkins NJ; Schisterman EF
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):428-41. PubMed ID: 16161802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Setting sample size to ensure narrow confidence intervals for precise estimation of population values.
    Corty EW; Corty RW
    Nurs Res; 2011; 60(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 21336224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Power analysis.
    Allison SC
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Mar; 34(3):150-1; author reply 151-2. PubMed ID: 15089028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Confidence bands for receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Ma G; Hall WJ
    Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 8412547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Bender R; Kuss O; Langan D; Higgins JPT; Knapp G; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 30129707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point.
    Fluss R; Faraggi D; Reiser B
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):458-72. PubMed ID: 16161804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multiplicity adjustment big and small in clinical studies.
    Hsu JC
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Aug; 88(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 20592727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability of nutritional screening and assessment tools.
    Jones JM
    Nutrition; 2004 Mar; 20(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 14990273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Identifying and assessing the null hypothesis.
    Luft HS
    Health Serv Res; 2000 Feb; 34(6):1265-71. PubMed ID: 10654829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Confidence interval estimation for sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity for combined biomarkers.
    Tian L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):499-512. PubMed ID: 23611191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Meta-analysis of ROC curves.
    Kester AD; Buntinx F
    Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 11059476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries.
    Marino MJ
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2018 May; 151():226-233. PubMed ID: 29248599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimize the use of minimization with unequal allocation.
    Proschan M; Brittain E; Kammerman L
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1135-41. PubMed ID: 21281276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficient confidence bounds for ROC curves.
    Schäfer H
    Stat Med; 1994 Aug; 13(15):1551-61. PubMed ID: 7973233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Significance Test, Confidence Interval, Both or Neither?
    Knapp TR
    Clin Nurs Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):259-265. PubMed ID: 28503970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Goodness-of-fit issues in ROC curve estimation.
    Walsh SJ
    Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 10231082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity.
    Buderer NM
    Acad Emerg Med; 1996 Sep; 3(9):895-900. PubMed ID: 8870764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Design of a study to improve accuracy in reading mammograms.
    Pepe MS; Urban N; Rutter C; Longton G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Dec; 50(12):1327-38. PubMed ID: 9449936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Subjective evaluation of medical images by using ROC analysis].
    Katsuragawa S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Mar; 60(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 15131495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.