These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23252687)

  • 1. Comparison of commercial kits for the extraction of DNA from paddy soils.
    Knauth S; Schmidt H; Tippkötter R
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2013 Mar; 56(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 23252687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for isolation and purification of bacterial and eukaryotic DNA from PAH-contaminated soils.
    Mahmoudi N; Slater GF; Fulthorpe RR
    Can J Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 57(8):623-8. PubMed ID: 21815819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biases in community structures of ammonia/ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms caused by insufficient DNA extractions from Baijiang soil revealed by comparative analysis of coastal wetland sediment and rice paddy soil.
    Han P; Li M; Gu JD
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2013 Oct; 97(19):8741-56. PubMed ID: 23974369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A rapid DNA extraction method for PCR amplification from wetland soils.
    Li J; Li B; Zhou Y; Xu J; Zhao J
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2011 Jun; 52(6):626-33. PubMed ID: 21545471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DGGE method for analyzing 16S rDNA of methanogenic archaeal community in paddy field soil.
    Watanabe T; Asakawa S; Nakamura A; Nagaoka K; Kimura M
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2004 Mar; 232(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 15033234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of the extraction and purification of soil DNA and pooling of PCR amplification products on the description of bacterial and archaeal communities.
    Sáenz JS; Roldan F; Junca H; Arbeli Z
    J Appl Microbiol; 2019 May; 126(5):1454-1467. PubMed ID: 30802335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phenotypic characterization of Rice Cluster III archaea without prior isolation by applying quantitative polymerase chain reaction to an enrichment culture.
    Kemnitz D; Kolb S; Conrad R
    Environ Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 7(4):553-65. PubMed ID: 15816932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methanogenic communities in permafrost-affected soils of the Laptev Sea coast, Siberian Arctic, characterized by 16S rRNA gene fingerprints.
    Ganzert L; Jurgens G; Münster U; Wagner D
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2007 Feb; 59(2):476-88. PubMed ID: 16978241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of DNA extraction protocols for microbial communities from soil treated with biochar.
    Leite DC; Balieiro FC; Pires CA; Madari BE; Rosado AS; Coutinho HL; Peixoto RS
    Braz J Microbiol; 2014; 45(1):175-83. PubMed ID: 24948928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens.
    Ariefdjohan MW; Savaiano DA; Nakatsu CH
    Nutr J; 2010 May; 9():23. PubMed ID: 20492702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of bacterial community structure in soil by polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.
    Gelsomino A; Keijzer-Wolters AC; Cacco G; van Elsas JD
    J Microbiol Methods; 1999 Oct; 38(1-2):1-15. PubMed ID: 10520580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commercial DNA extraction kits impact observed microbial community composition in permafrost samples.
    Vishnivetskaya TA; Layton AC; Lau MC; Chauhan A; Cheng KR; Meyers AJ; Murphy JR; Rogers AW; Saarunya GS; Williams DE; Pfiffner SM; Biggerstaff JP; Stackhouse BT; Phelps TJ; Whyte L; Sayler GS; Onstott TC
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2014 Jan; 87(1):217-30. PubMed ID: 24102625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bacterial diversity of soils assessed by DGGE, T-RFLP and SSCP fingerprints of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene fragments: do the different methods provide similar results?
    Smalla K; Oros-Sichler M; Milling A; Heuer H; Baumgarte S; Becker R; Neuber G; Kropf S; Ulrich A; Tebbe CC
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Jun; 69(3):470-9. PubMed ID: 17407797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DNA-based stable isotope probing identifies formate-metabolizing methanogenic archaea in paddy soil.
    Xu J; Jia Z; Lin X; Feng Y
    Microbiol Res; 2017 Sep; 202():36-42. PubMed ID: 28647121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of DNA isolation method on the investigation of archaeal diversity and abundance in biogas plants.
    Theiss J; Rother M; Röske K
    Arch Microbiol; 2016 Sep; 198(7):619-28. PubMed ID: 27089887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reverse-transcriptional gene expression of anammox and ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria in soybean and rice paddy soils of Northeast China.
    Wang J; Dong H; Wang W; Gu JD
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Mar; 98(6):2675-86. PubMed ID: 24077726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Traditional cattle manure application determines abundance, diversity and activity of methanogenic Archaea in arable European soil.
    Gattinger A; Höfle MG; Schloter M; Embacher A; Böhme F; Munch JC; Labrenz M
    Environ Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 9(3):612-24. PubMed ID: 17298362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bacterial populations colonizing and degrading rice straw in anoxic paddy soil.
    Weber S; Stubner S; Conrad R
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 67(3):1318-27. PubMed ID: 11229927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples.
    Claassen S; du Toit E; Kaba M; Moodley C; Zar HJ; Nicol MP
    J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Aug; 94(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 23684993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molecular analysis of bacterial community structures in paddy soils for environmental risk assessment with two varieties of genetically modified rice, Iksan 483 and Milyang 204.
    Kim MC; Ahn JH; Shin HC; Kim T; Ryu TH; Kim DH; Song HG; Lee GH; Ka JO
    J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 18(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 18309263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.