These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2325289)

  • 1. [A study of image processing in CR mammography; gradation processing].
    Muramatsu Y; Nawano S; Anan M; Hanmura K; Tanaka T; Matsue H; Yamada T
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1990 Feb; 35(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 2325289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A trial of selective imaging for the breast mass shadow by computed radiography].
    Muramatsu Y; Anan M; Tanaka T; Matsue H; Yamada T
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1990 Mar; 35(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 2345404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Efficacy of storage phosphor-based digital mammography in diagnosis of breast cancer--comparison with film-screen mammography].
    Kitahama H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 May; 51(5):547-60. PubMed ID: 1651472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physical evaluation of computed radiography as a mammographic X-ray imaging system.
    Workman A; Cowen AR; Brettle DS
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):988-96. PubMed ID: 8000844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The application of computerized color composition technique on X-ray mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Yuan YX
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1990 Nov; 28(11):662-4, 702. PubMed ID: 2086070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Image quality and radiation exposure in mass mammography examinations: a report from the Survey Group for Institutional Evaluation].
    Suzuki R; Horita K; Asahara M; Koyama S; Sanada S; Terada H; Nishitani M; Ishikawa M; Wakamaru A; Kurowarabi K; Negishi T;
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 May; 59(5):604-16. PubMed ID: 12881688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A study of image processing condition of mammography using FCR (Fuji Computed Radiography)].
    Nakata M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 49(4):454-67. PubMed ID: 2798048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial recurrence analysis: a sensitive and fast detection tool in digital mammography.
    Prado TL; Galuzio PP; Lopes SR; Viana RL
    Chaos; 2014 Mar; 24(1):013106. PubMed ID: 24697368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Computer-assisted visualization of digital mammography images].
    Funke M; Netsch T; Breiter N; Biehl M; Peitgen HO; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1999 Nov; 171(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 10619037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fourier domain image fusion for differential X-ray phase-contrast breast imaging.
    Coello E; Sperl JI; Bequé D; Benz T; Scherer K; Herzen J; Sztrókay-Gaul A; Hellerhoff K; Pfeiffer F; Cozzini C; Grandl S
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():27-32. PubMed ID: 28267545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Selection of parameters for multi-objective frequency processing in CR mammography: visual evaluation of mammographic phantom images].
    Ishihara K; Ishida E; Iwanaga H; Hashida M; Sanada T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Mar; 61(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 15815561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New, accurate 3-D imaging may prevent breast biopsies.
    Telemed Virtual Real; 1998 Mar; 3(3):25-6. PubMed ID: 10183403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography in the detection of breast cancer: rays of light through DMIST or more fog?
    Tice JA; Feldman MD
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jan; 107(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 17377840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type.
    Cole EB; Pisano ED; Kistner EO; Muller KE; Brown ME; Feig SA; Jong RA; Maidment AD; Staiger MJ; Kuzmiak CM; Freimanis RI; Lesko N; Rosen EL; Walsh R; Williford M; Braeuning MP
    Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 12511684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential.
    Adler DD; Wahl RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 7998538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recent topics in breast cancer.
    Mukai K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2000 May; 30(5):248-9, 251. PubMed ID: 10857506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design of a Low-Cost Diffuse Optical Mammography System for Biomedical Image Processing in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
    Rivera-Fernández JD; Roa-Tort K; Stolik S; Valor A; Fabila-Bustos DA; de la Rosa G; Hernández-Chávez M; de la Rosa-Vázquez JM
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 37177594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast calcifications: analysis of imaging properties.
    Olson SL; Fam BW; Winter PF; Scholz FJ; Lee AK; Gordon SE
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 3174980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
    Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.