BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23253359)

  • 1. Throwing the baby out with the bath water? Occupational hygienists' views on the revised dutch system for occupational exposure limits.
    Schenk L; Palmen NG
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):581-92. PubMed ID: 23253359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Industry Derived Occupational Exposure Limits: A Survey of Professionals on the Dutch System of Exposure Guidelines.
    Schenk L; Visser MJ; Palmen NGM
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Nov; 63(9):1004-1012. PubMed ID: 31504142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extensive changes to occupational exposure limits in Korea.
    Jeong JY; Choi S; Kho YL; Kim PG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 58(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 20709131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative study on occupational exposure limits of chemical substances in workplace between GBZ 2.1 in China and ACGIH in USA].
    Li W; Zhang M; Wang D
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 32(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 24428986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misinterpretation and misuse of exposure limits.
    Hewett P
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Feb; 16(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 11217719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occupational exposure limits in Europe and Asia--continued divergence or global harmonization?
    Ding Q; Schenk L; Malkiewicz K; Hansson SO
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Dec; 61(3):296-309. PubMed ID: 21907258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reassessment of occupational exposure limits.
    Stouten H; Ott H; Bouwman C; Wardenbach P
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Jun; 51(6):407-18. PubMed ID: 18409185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exposure limits for nanoparticles: report of an international workshop on nano reference values.
    van Broekhuizen P; van Veelen W; Streekstra WH; Schulte P; Reijnders L
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):515-24. PubMed ID: 22752096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Global Landscape of Occupational Exposure Limits--Implementation of Harmonization Principles to Guide Limit Selection.
    Deveau M; Chen CP; Johanson G; Krewski D; Maier A; Niven KJ; Ripple S; Schulte PA; Silk J; Urbanus JH; Zalk DM; Niemeier RW
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12 Suppl 1(sup1):S127-44. PubMed ID: 26099071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Awareness and understanding of occupational exposure limits in Sweden.
    Schenk L
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Apr; 65(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 23376473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Japan.
    Takahashi K; Higashi T
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 16510222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Korea.
    Paek D; Park DY
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 16564609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occupational exposure limits for chemicals.
    Topping M
    Occup Environ Med; 2001 Feb; 58(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 11160994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Occupational exposure limits: a comparative study.
    Schenk L; Hansson SO; Rudén C; Gilek M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Mar; 50(2):261-70. PubMed ID: 18226844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exposure limit values for nanomaterials--capacity and willingness of users to apply a precautionary approach.
    van Broekhuizen P; Dorbeck-Jung B
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 23216200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in China.
    Liang Y; Wong O; Yang L; Li T; Su Z
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 16624464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are occupational exposure limits becoming more alike within the European Union?
    Schenk L; Hansson SO; Rudén C; Gilek M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 28(7):858-66. PubMed ID: 18381691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New trends in the development of occupational exposure limits for airborne chemicals in China.
    Liang YX; Su Z; Wu WA; Lu BQ; Fu WZ; Yang L; Gu JY
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2003 Oct; 38(2):112-23. PubMed ID: 14550754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Taiwan.
    Shih TS; Wu KY; Chen HI; Chang CP; Chang HY; Huang YS; Liou SH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 16701932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of REACH-derived no-effect levels for workers with EU indicative occupational exposure limit values and national limit values in Finland.
    Tynkkynen S; Santonen T; Stockmann-Juvala H
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 25638729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.