These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23253845)

  • 1. Survival of short implants is improved with greater implant length, placement in the mandible compared with the maxilla, and in nonsmokers.
    Carr AB
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):189-91. PubMed ID: 23253845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The evidence for endorsing the use of short dental implants remains inconclusive.
    Jokstad A
    Evid Based Dent; 2011 Dec; 12(4):99-101. PubMed ID: 22193649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Descriptive analysis of implant and prosthodontic survival rates with fixed implant-supported rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla.
    Lambert FE; Weber HP; Susarla SM; Belser UC; Gallucci GO
    J Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 80(8):1220-30. PubMed ID: 19656021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early survival of single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone may be predictable despite timing of implant placement or loading.
    Knoernschild KL
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):209-12. PubMed ID: 23253847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of smoking on the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants.
    Balshe AA; Eckert SE; Koka S; Assad DA; Weaver AL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1117-22. PubMed ID: 19216282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early survival of single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone may be predictable despite timing of implant placement or loading.
    Knoernschild KL
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 10(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 20230971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient.
    Telleman G; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; den Hartog L; Huddleston Slater JJ; Meijer HJ
    J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 38(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 21564158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A retrospective study of the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants.
    Balshe AA; Assad DA; Eckert SE; Koka S; Weaver AL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 20162117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acid-etched surface.
    Cochran D; Oates T; Morton D; Jones A; Buser D; Peters F
    J Periodontol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):974-82. PubMed ID: 17539708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
    Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< or = 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients.
    Hagi D; Deporter DA; Pilliar RM; Arenovich T
    J Periodontol; 2004 Jun; 75(6):798-804. PubMed ID: 15295944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early complete failures of fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla: a 3-year analysis of 17 consecutive cluster failure patients.
    Jemt T; Häger P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 16774593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survival rates of short-span implant-supported cantilever fixed dental prostheses.
    Stafford GL
    Evid Based Dent; 2010; 11(2):50-1. PubMed ID: 20577286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A retrospective evaluation of 1,387 single-tooth implants: a 6-year follow-up.
    Levin L; Sadet P; Grossmann Y
    J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):2080-3. PubMed ID: 17209794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant location and radiotherapy are the only factors linked to 2-year implant failure.
    Carr AB
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):217-9. PubMed ID: 23253850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures supported by a combination of teeth and implants.
    Weber HP; Zimering Y
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):215-6. PubMed ID: 23253849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Survival rate for implants placed in the posterior maxilla with and without sinus augmentation: a comparative cohort study.
    Barone A; Orlando B; Tonelli P; Covani U
    J Periodontol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 20831372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the effectiveness of dental implant therapy in a practice-based network (FOCUS).
    Stanford CM; Wagner W; Rodriguez Y Baena R; Norton M; McGlumphy E; Schmidt J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 20369097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Growing body of evidence on survival rates of implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Abt E
    Evid Based Dent; 2008; 9(2):51-2. PubMed ID: 18584006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis.
    Srinivasan M; Vazquez L; Rieder P; Moraguez O; Bernard JP; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 23413956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.